Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1165 (0.46 seconds)

Sh. Sameer Saxena vs State on 25 November, 2019

appellants would have been given benefit of marginal error / analytical error as there was marginal deficiency being less than 1%. The appellants­herein were ... therefore, the appellants should have been given the benefit of marginal error / analytical error. The report of Food Analyst is not proved
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Arvind Kumar Singh vs State on 25 November, 2019

appellants would have been given benefit of marginal error / analytical error as there was marginal deficiency being less than 1%. The laboratory of the Food ... therefore, the appellants should have been given the benefit of marginal error / analytical error. The report of Food Analyst is not proved
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Sanjay on 29 January, 2007

years. It is further contended that there is always margin of error of two years in age ascertained in radiological examination and benefit of margin ... always goes to accused. It is contended that if benefit of margin of error is given, prosecutrix was 18 years at the time of alleged
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Kamlesh on 22 March, 2024

bone ossification test, after all, is a scientific examination having proved margin of error attached with it. Hon'ble Apex Court of India ... commission of offence under all circumstances, even by extended any margin of error on lower side. Accordingly, this court concurs with the finding
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next