further submitted that the learned trial court committed an error in
giving the margin of two years in favour of the accused while calculating ... offence i.e. 30.10.2009 and giving the
benefit of margin of error of one year to the accused as per Rule
notorious and one can take judicial notice that the margin of error in age ascertained by radiological. examination is two years on either side.
Hence
Post Mortem report is an approximation and
hence, a margin of error of five to six hours will have to be
factored in. In these
notorious and one can take judicial notice that the margin of error in age ascertained by radiological examination is two years on either side.
Hence
occur
in the depositions of witnesses due to normal errors of observation,
namely, errors of memory due to lapse of time or due to mental ... crucible for being tested on the
touchstone of credibility." Therefore, mere marginal variations in the
statements of a witness cannot be dubbed as improvements
occur
in the depositions of witnesses due to normal errors of observation,
12
namely, errors of memory due to lapse of time ... crucible for being tested on the
touchstone of credibility." Therefore, mere marginal variations in the
statements of a witness cannot be dubbed as improvements
normal
discrepancies are bound to be there due to normal
errors of observation, normal errors of memory due to
lapse of time, due to mental ... crucible for being
tested on the touchstone of credibility.
17. Mere marginal variations in the statements
cannot be dubbed as improvements as the same
normal discrepancies are bound to be there due to
normal errors of observation, normal errors of memory due to
lapse of time, due to mental ... Downloaded on - 25/05/2018 23:03:37 :::HCHP
8
12. Mere marginal variations in the statements cannot
be dubbed as improvements as the same
assault. To my mind, therefore, all these circumstances, taken together, leave no margin for doubt and as such, the original positive finding of the learned ... Apart from the above two serious infirmities, the learned committed another basic error of law which completely vitiates his finding that the appellant has committed
grave error in holding that Chet Ram inflicted injury
no. 1, which was in the nature of incised wound, elliptical shaped,
having regular margins 8cmx2
