Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1577 (2.09 seconds)

Sh. Sameer Saxena vs State on 25 November, 2019

appellants would have been given benefit of marginal error / analytical error as there was marginal deficiency being less than 1%. The appellantsĀ­herein were ... therefore, the appellants should have been given the benefit of marginal error / analytical error. The report of Food Analyst is not proved
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Arvind Kumar Singh vs State on 25 November, 2019

appellants would have been given benefit of marginal error / analytical error as there was marginal deficiency being less than 1%. The laboratory of the Food ... therefore, the appellants should have been given the benefit of marginal error / analytical error. The report of Food Analyst is not proved
Delhi District Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next