years. It is further contended that there is always margin of
error of two years in age ascertained in radiological examination
and benefit of margin ... always goes to accused. It is
contended that if benefit of margin of error is given, prosecutrix
was 18 years at the time of alleged
Guna @ Gunasekaran vs State By Inspector Of Police (L&O) on 4 July, 2019
issued by the Doctor based on radiology or dentist opinion
then margin of error in age ascertained is two years on
either side. Age estimation ... Supreme Court had observed that one can take judicial
notice that margin of error in age ascertained by
radiological examination is two years on either
Home Secretary, Government of
Jammu and Kashmir 1has observed that the margin of error in age
ascertained by radiological examination is two years on either ... that 21 would be a reasonable age. Even if, we
consider margin of error of two years on either side, prosecutrix should have
been
several decisions has taken judicial notice of the fact
that the margin of error in age ascertained by radiological examination is
two years on either ... found to
be between 18 to 21 years. So applying the margin of error principle, of two
years on either side, the age could
State vs . Sushil Kumar on 5 August, 2013
1
IN THE COURT OF MS. ILLA
years. Since prosecutrix
has been examined only radiologically, a margin of error of two years on either side
in age ascertained by radiological examination ... Himachal Pradesh, held that in a case of
ossification test, the margin of error on either side varies from 1 ½ to 2 years and
benefit
exact and may vary by two years on
either side. Margin of error in such a radiological
examination is two years on either side ... held by Hon'ble Supreme Court that
margin of error in age ascertained by radiological
examination is to be taken as two years
years, but less than 16 years. It was observed that margin of error in the
radiologist'
s examination was of two years on either ... notorious and one can take judicial notice that the margin
of error in age ascertained by radiological examination is two years on either
side
between 13 to 15 years and further
testified that no error of margin could be given as they had already
given two years margin ... above
15 years on 07.09.06 and also that no further error or margin could be given
8/39
9
State Vs. Ram Kirpal
