years. It is further contended that there is always margin of
error of two years in age ascertained in radiological examination
and benefit of margin ... always goes to accused. It is
contended that if benefit of margin of error is given, prosecutrix
was 18 years at the time of alleged
more than 22 years but less
than 40 years including margin of error. The said report reads:
“MD/ AGE/ 198/ 2005
Department of Forensic Science ... years but less than
forty years (40 years)' including margin of error.
Signed in the presence of:
Sd/
B G More
Guna @ Gunasekaran vs State By Inspector Of Police (L&O) on 4 July, 2019
time. It is
also submitted that in fact looking to the margin of error as per the
medical jurisprudence, since doctor has admitted that ... than 18 years at the
time of incident then keeping that error of margin in mind, it can be
well above 18 years, and thus
himself and another, said that it is universally accepted that the margin of error in the opinion of the radiologist two years. The observations ... margin of difference can be about 2 years on either side. In this case there was no margin for an error since all the epiphysis
issued by the Doctor based on radiology or dentist opinion
then margin of error in age ascertained is two years on
either side. Age estimation ... Supreme Court had observed that one can take judicial
notice that margin of error in age ascertained by
radiological examination is two years on either
notorious and
one can take judicial notice that the margin of error in
age ascertained by radiological examination is two years
on either side. Undoubtedly ... case of Jaya Mala (supra), it is clear that the
margin of error in age ascertained by the radiological examination is
two years on either
notorious and one
rt
can take judicial notice that the margin of error in age
ascertained by radiological examination is two years
on either side ... Court in a catena of
judgments that in ossification test, the margin of error of two
years on either side is possible, therefore, even
Government of Jammu & Kashmir & Ors. holding that the margin of error in age ascertained by Radiological examination is two years on either side ... judgment in Jaimala's case regarding the judicial recognition of margin of error of two years, he would prefer the testimony of parents
gave his opinion observing the developments of
bones and therefore marginal error of two years on
either side was possible. In this view the trial
