soil underlying such waters, continental shelf, exclusive economic zone or any other maritime zone as referred to in the Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic ... Zone and Other Maritime Zones Act, 1976, and the air space above its territory and territorial waters; (53) "Indian company" means a company formed
defendant no.2‟).
4. The entire controversy revolves around the maritime voyage of a
Charterparty for the transport of crude oil from Kuwait to India ... defendant no. 1 also sought for an interim
injunction from the First Maritime Court and on 30.12.2020, an interim
injunction was granted restraining the sale
Shabnam Minwalla vs The Maharashtra Maritime Board on 15 July, 2025
2025:BHC-OS:10787-DB
13336.24-wp+.docx
BASAVRAJ IN THE HIGH COURT ... Shabnam Minwalla & Ors. .....Petitioners
Vs.
The Maharashtra Maritime Board
& Ors. .....Respondents
----------------
Mr. Shiraz Rustomjee, Senior Advocae with
Mr. Jai Chhabria, Ms. Smriti Singh
Alphard Maritime Ltd vs Ocean Jade (Imo:9660750) on 9 July, 2025
Author: Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo
Bench: Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo
IN THE HIGH COURT ... ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ADMLS No. 2 of 2025
ALPHARD MARITIME LTD. ... ... Plaintiff
-Versus-
OCEAN JADE (IMO:9660750) ... ... Defendants
and another.
Advocates appeared in this case
Shabnam Minwalla vs The Maharashtra Maritime Board on 15 July, 2025
2025:BHC-OS:10787-DB
13336.24-wp+.docx
BASAVRAJ IN THE HIGH COURT ... Shabnam Minwalla & Ors. .....Petitioners
Vs.
The Maharashtra Maritime Board
& Ors. .....Respondents
----------------
Mr. Shiraz Rustomjee, Senior Advocae with
Mr. Jai Chhabria, Ms. Smriti Singh
prevent LED fishing in the Indian EEZ
beyond territorial waters. Similarly, all maritime States and
Union Territories were advised to take the necessary steps ... Coast Guard Act to enforce the provisions in the
Maritime Zones. It was further contended in paragraph 18 that the
order dated
prevent LED fishing in the Indian EEZ
beyond territorial waters. Similarly, all maritime States and
Union Territories were advised to take the necessary steps ... Coast Guard Act to enforce the provisions in the
Maritime Zones. It was further contended in paragraph 18 that the
order dated
valid
agreement, and that the dispute did not fall under maritime arbitration. They
terminated the COA on 11.09.2012, backdating it to April ... claim was a civil matter and, hence,
outside the scope of maritime arbitration.
26. In their rejoinder, Seaspray refuted SAIL's defences, stating that
valid
agreement, and that the dispute did not fall under maritime arbitration. They
terminated the COA on 11.09.2012, backdating it to April ... claim was a civil matter and, hence,
outside the scope of maritime arbitration.
26. In their rejoinder, Seaspray refuted SAIL's defences, stating that
appellant under
Section 14 of the Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of
Maritime Claims) Act, 2017 for following reliefs:
"A. To set aside oral judgment ... leading to the said
suit falls within the definition of a 'Maritime Claim' as per Section
4(r) of the Admiralty
