dispute.
3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent-Markfed
submits that these are official and undisputed documents, being part of the
judicial ... dated 30.07.2004.
2. In brief, the facts as stated are that respondent-Markfed and the
appellant herein entered into an agreement dated 29.02.1996 for shelling
Jhalli Rice Mills And Ors vs Markfed And Ors on 15 July, 2019
Author: Jaishree Thakur
Bench: Jaishree Thakur
Punjab Markfed vs Pratham Rice Mills on 15 January, 2019
Author: Jaishree Thakur
Bench: Jaishree Thakur
FAO No. 5092 of 2018 1
IN THE HIGH ... Date of decision: 15.1.2019
Punjab Markfed
...Appellant
Versus
M/s Pratham Rice Mills
...Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Present: Mr. Naresh
deliver 46464.98 quintals of
rice to the Food Corporation of India in Markfed Account, however, the
Miller did not mill the entire quantity and there ... rice of all varieties delivered by the
Miller to the FCI in Markfed account shall conform to the
specifications laid down in the Punjab Rice
Arbitrator.
2. In brief, the facts are that the appellant/Markfed entered into an
agreement with the respondent M/s Swati Rice Mills ... dispute that arose, the sole Arbitrator was appointed by the Managing
Director, Markfed to adjudicate upon the matter. The Arbitrator by its
award dated
aforesaid agreement, clearly show that all
disputes between the Markfed and the miller were
liable to be referred to the arbitration concerning the
agreement except ... provided in Sub-clause (1) above the
miller shall pay to the Markfed the cost of paddy
equivalent to the shortfall at the rate
aforesaid agreement, clearly show that all
disputes between the Markfed and the miller were
liable to be referred to the arbitration concerning the
agreement except ... provided in Sub-clause (1) above the
miller shall pay to the Markfed the cost of paddy
equivalent to the shortfall at the rate
aforesaid agreement, clearly show that all
disputes between the Markfed and the miller were
liable to be referred to the arbitration concerning the
agreement except ... provided in Sub-clause (1) above the
miller shall pay to the Markfed the cost of paddy
equivalent to the shortfall at the rate
aforesaid agreement, clearly show that all
disputes between the Markfed and the miller were
liable to be referred to the arbitration concerning the
agreement except ... provided in Sub-clause (1) above the
miller shall pay to the Markfed the cost of paddy
equivalent to the shortfall at the rate
between the Markfed and the miller were liable to be
referred to the arbitration concerning the agreement except
disputes regarding the matters, the decision
