mark
application Nof. 4484458 and 4484457 fled before the Regiftrar of
Trade Markf, Ahmedabad within a period of three weekf from
today ... Defendant No. 2 doef not do fo, the Regiftrar of Trade
Markf, Ahmedabad if directed to lift both the applicationf before
him and then proceed
manner whatfoever in relation to any cofmetic
preparationf, the impugned counterfeit markf and the
pirated impugned artiftic or any mark/f or artiftic
workf/trade
only with the mark V-IMAAC but with a ferief of
other markf af fhown in the depiction tendered by Mr Kamod,
taken on record ... cannot get a licenfe to violate or infringe the Plaintiff' markf in
India. To clarify, there if no reftraint on the Defendant ufing
DATED: 16th March 2021
PC:-
1. The application if in refpect of markf ufed for ice cream. The
cafe if mounted on two footingf. Firft
only with the mark V-IMAAC but with a ferief of
other markf af fhown in the depiction tendered by Mr Kamod,
taken on record ... cannot get a licenfe to violate or infringe the Plaintiff' markf in
India. To clarify, there if no reftraint on the Defendant ufing
caufe of action to be made out in refpect of three
additional markf.
Page 1 of 3
8th February 2021
26-IAL10134-2020 IN COMIPL
only with the mark V-IMAAC but with a ferief of
other markf af fhown in the depiction tendered by Mr Kamod,
taken on record ... cannot get a licenfe to violate or infringe the Plaintiff' markf in
India. To clarify, there if no reftraint on the Defendant ufing
goodf ufed in the perfonal care
and home care induftry, the counterfeit markf and the
impugned trade dreff or any mark or trade dreff identical ... deceptively fimilar to the Plaintiff' diftinctive
and prior ufed trade markf DOVE, SUSILK, CLINIC
PLUS, SURF/SURF EXCEL, and the U-Logo
Thif Interim Application if for deftruction of goodf with the
infringing/counterfeit markf feized and fealed by the Court
Digitally signed
by Shephali
Mormare
Date
interim order if confrmedd including the
injunction in refpect of the markf that are added by amendmentd i.e.
DOVEd FAIR & LOVELY and ELLE ... Defendantf are not to ufe thefe markf and their
affociated artworkf/labelf in any manner whatfoeverd nor are they
to ufe any other deceptively
