applicant
No. 5, Satwinder Singh on the ground of below bench mark APAR.
8
O.A.060/00238/2017
O.A.060/00280/2017 ... lieu of Grading
e/m (Retd.) 2.8.2000) below
Revised bench
DPC) mark
(f) 507510 Sh. Sohan 09.08.1999 02.08.2000 - do - AMIE
Lal Verma
would award 5 marks
towards 'outstanding' grading, 4 marks toward 'very good'
grading and 3 marks towards 'good' grading ... marks as against the 20 marks secured by
the respondent. Instead of grading the selected candidate /
officer as 'outstanding', all that the DPC
meet the prescribed bench mark) by the DPC
shall be included and arranged in the select panel in order of inter-se
seniority ... graded "Unfit" (in
terms of the prescribed bench mark) by the DPC shall not be included
in the select panel. Thus, there shall
applicant
No. 5, Satwinder Singh on the ground of below bench mark APAR.
8
O.A.060/00238/2017
O.A.060/00280/2017 ... lieu of Grading
e/m (Retd.) 2.8.2000) below
Revised bench
DPC) mark
(f) 507510 Sh. Sohan 09.08.1999 02.08.2000 - do - AMIE
Lal Verma
applicant
No. 5, Satwinder Singh on the ground of below bench mark APAR.
8
O.A.060/00238/2017
O.A.060/00280/2017 ... lieu of Grading
e/m (Retd.) 2.8.2000) below
Revised bench
DPC) mark
(f) 507510 Sh. Sohan 09.08.1999 02.08.2000 - do - AMIE
Lal Verma
applicant
No. 5, Satwinder Singh on the ground of below bench mark APAR.
8
O.A.060/00238/2017
O.A.060/00280/2017 ... lieu of Grading
e/m (Retd.) 2.8.2000) below
Revised bench
DPC) mark
(f) 507510 Sh. Sohan 09.08.1999 02.08.2000 - do - AMIE
Lal Verma
meet the prescribed
bench-mark) by the DPC shall be included and arranged in
the select panel in order to their inter-se seniority ... graded 'unfit' (in
terms of the prescribed bench-mark) by the DPC shall not
be included in the Select Panel. Thus, there shall
Committee
11
unanimously resolved to enhance and fix 55% marks as
the necessary cut off marks for adjudging the competence
of the candidate to discharge ... list to 11 candidates who
had obtained 55% and above marks. The DPC thereafter,
perusing the ACR's of the 11 employees shortlisted
been examined by the DPC. As per the DPC
guidelines issued vide OM dated 10th April, 1989, the DPC should not be
guided merely ... wrote the APAR and TRWO has given him zero (3.66 marks).
The DPC also considered that the overall pen-picture of the petitioner as
reflected
merit-cum-seniority and review petitioner
secured 20 marks and writ petitioner secured 19 marks, therefore,
despite being junior in the seniority list, name ... DPC. According to review petitioner, the DPC
considered the ACR of the writ petitioner of the year 2007 and 2008
also and awarded 19 marks
