plaintiffs. All that has
been recorded is their status as gair Marusi tenant (tenant at will). The
Supreme Court in the case of " Natha ... view taken by Coordinate Bench of this Court, a Gair Marusi
(tenant) cannot acquire the status and right of Marusi (occupancy tenant
year 1963-64 Chetu Ram was recorded as a Gair Marusi tenant. The
appellant-plaintiff claims his title from Chetu Ram. It was held ... case (supra), that only a Marusi tenant will become
occupancy tenant and Gair Marusi tenant is not entitled to the same.
Hence, there
regular continuous possession of the land in dispute
being gair marusi tenants since the time of their father Dalip Singh
who was a gair marusi ... possession of the land in dispute as gair marusi tenants and
tenancy has not been determined by the Gram Panchayat. The
petitioners not being
suit for declaration to the effect that he is a Gair Marusi tenant on Batai
Tihai over the land measuring 36 kanals 10 marlas comprising ... answering defendant is in possession of the suit land as
Gair Marusi tenant since Rabi 1997. They further made their
statement that the plaintiff
cultivating possession of the suit land as gair marusi tenant for the
last about 25 years. Jamna Devi was the owner of the suit property ... Devi admitting the rights of respondent No.1- plaintiff as gair marusi
tenant, had been receiving Batai. After the death of Jamna Devi, the property
fact that the petitioner and his brothers are coming as Gair
Marusi/tenant for the last more than 70-75 years on the whole property ... learned counsel for the petitioner that
the petitioner is the Gair Marusi/tenant over the land in dispute. He has
submitted that respondent
Bhagwana/predecessor in interest of the plaintiffs is shown as gair
marusi tenant on payment of 1/3rd batai. Similar entry is shown in
jamabandi ... Bhagwana has been shown as gair marusi tenant
on payment of 1/3rd batai. Same entry is repeated in the entire revenue
record. As such
entries in possessory column in their favour showing them as
Gair Marusi tenants under the mortgagees in the revenue
record with intention to grab ... plaintiffs, Lakhbir Singh and Tarsem etc. were never inducted
as Gair Marusi tenants by the plaintiffs. The defendants had
rt
forcibly taken possession
entries in possessory column in their favour showing them as
Gair Marusi tenants under the mortgagees in the revenue
record with intention to grab ... Lakhbir Singh
of
and Tarsem etc. were never inducted as Gair Marusi tenants
by the plaintiffs.
rt The defendants had forcibly taken
possession
recorded in
possession of the suit land as 'Gair Marusi' tenant, which order of
Assistant Collector, 2nd Grade, Jogindernagar, is illegal, null ... cultivating in possession of the suit land as
'gair marusi' tenant on an application made by him, Assistant Collector
2nd Grade, Jogindernagar, being
