Sukhdev Singh And Others vs Jaswinder Kaur on 17 August, 2022
will be no any match of their DNA with
plaintiff or what if their mother at the time of conception of plaintiff was
having relation
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 186 (1.01 seconds)State Of Haryana & Another vs Suraj Mal --Respondent on 13 June, 2012
still continue to cling to outmoded concepts
and outworn ideologies? Should we not adjust our thinking
caps to match the fashion of the day? Should
M/S Bansal Alloys & Metals Private ... vs Union Of India And Another on 8 November, 2010
Gujarat Travancore Agency v.
CIT ( 1989) 3 SCC 52, Swedish Match AB v. SEBI , ( 2004) 11 SCC 641,
SEBI v. Cabot International Capital Corpn ... Comp Cases 841
(Bom.), it was held that plea of concept of inbuilt discretion in Rules 96ZO
and 96ZQ could not be accepted. The observations
Asha Rani And Ors. vs Union Of India on 26 February, 1982
pecuniary loss caused to the dependents and solatium was alien to the concept of compensation in this context. The whole object, therefore, is to give ... were totally conjectural and hypothetical. For instance, the slippery factor of inflation matched by rising 'Bank interest rates' was ruled
Harjinder Kaur vs State Of Punjab And Others on 1 August, 2012
when the DNA profile of a
known individual (a victim or suspect) matches the
DNA profile from the crime-scene evidence;
exclusion i.e. when ... profile from an
individual (a victim or suspect) does not match the
DNA profile from the crime-scene evidence; and
inconclusive where the DNA testing
National Building Construction Corpn. ... vs State Of Haryana And Anr. on 9 January, 2007
view that the instant petition is liable to be dismissed. The concept of unconscionable clauses in a contract would arise only in specified circumstances ... been recognized between the standard form contracts between the parties enjoying fairly matching bargaining powers and those who are not enjoying such a freedom
Capt. Kanwaljit Singh vs Union Of India on 10 September, 1990
what it is. For that purpose, a comparison is undertaken to match the amendment with the original. Such a comparison can yield fruitful results even ... like trying to fit square peg into a round hole? Is the concept underlying Section 4 of the Ist Amendment an alien in the House
Municipal Council/Committee vs Tara Singh And Ors. on 18 July, 1996
found in sub-section (4) which totally negates the concept of contributory negligence. In Our opinion, therefore, a claim made Under Section 92A cannot ... creating 'no fault' liability the provision subserved a humanitarian object matching social realities."
(Underlining is ours.)
9. In New India Assurance
Love Kumar vs Sunita Puri on 26 September, 1996
Both are important. That interpretation is best which makes the textural interpretation match the contextual. A statute is best interpreted when we know ... interpretation of the words and application of a legislative intent devoid of concept of purpose will reduce most of the remedial and beneficent legislation
Rattan Chand vs Swaran Singh on 31 August, 1999
looked into. Rajasthan High Court in the case of Kotah Match Factory Kotah v. State of Rajasthan A.I.R. 1970 Rajasthan 118, however, concluded ... Affairs of the State " might have had a narrow conception. "Affairs of the State" then might have related to the matters