legem. This find
fortified in case of 'PCIT Vs Annasaheb Patil Mathadi Kamgar
Sahakari Pathpedi Ltd.' [2023, 454 ITR 117 (SC)], where
legem. This find
fortified in case of 'PCIT Vs Annasaheb Patil Mathadi Kamgar
Sahakari Pathpedi Ltd.' [2023, 454 ITR 117 (SC)], where
legem. This find
fortified in case of 'PCIT Vs Annasaheb Patil Mathadi Kamgar
Sahakari Pathpedi Ltd.' [2023, 454 ITR 117 (SC)], where
legem. This find fortified
in case of 'PCIT Vs Annasaheb Patil Mathadi Kamgar Sahakari
Pathpedi Ltd.' [2023, 454 ITR 117 (SC)], where
legem. This find fortified
in case of 'PCIT Vs Annasaheb Patil Mathadi Kamgar Sahakari
Pathpedi Ltd.' [2023, 454 ITR 117 (SC)], where
2023 &
ITA.Nos.05 & 06/PAN./2020
Annasaheb Patil Mathadi Kamgar Sahakari Pattapedi Ltd., [2023]
150 taxmann.com 173 (SC) have settled
legem. This find
fortified in case of 'PCIT Vs Annasaheb Patil Mathadi Kamgar
Sahakari Pathpedi Ltd.' [2023, 454 ITR 117 (SC)], where
Unprotected worker‟ was finally defined in Section 2(11) of the Mathadi
Act as follows:-
„‟unprotected worker‟ means a manual worker who is engaged