Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 142 (0.82 seconds)

Deepak Chandra Singh vs M/O Agriculture on 2 September, 2025

dated 15/19.05.2009, subject only to the condition of passing Matriculation within two years. The period was extended to five years by this ... applicant duly cleared Matriculation in 2013. 20. It is further argued that at the time of appointment, the prescribed qualification was Matriculation, which the applicant
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ranveer Singh vs Nvs on 3 May, 2024

clause 2 i.e. the posts of Mess Helper (Group C) [Post Code 13] whereby the respondents have advertised the posts and wrongly and illegally ... eligibility Criteria:- M. Mess Helper: (Post Code: 13): Age Limit: Between 18 and 30 years Essential qualifications:- (i) Matriculation pass (Class X passed from recognized
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Karam Chand vs Nvs on 3 May, 2024

clause 2 i.e. the posts of Mess Helper (Group C) [Post Code 13] whereby the respondents have advertised the posts and wrongly and illegally ... eligibility Criteria:- M. Mess Helper: (Post Code: 13): Age Limit: Between 18 and 30 years Essential qualifications:- (i) Matriculation pass (Class X passed from recognized
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Man Singh vs M/O Defence on 12 March, 2025

matriculates. These references have not been rebutted in the written statement filed on behalf of the respondents. Even regarding the issue of being matriculate ... matriculation. The requirement that a Group C employee must be a matriculate, has come into force only after the recommendation of the 6th CPC
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Raj Kumar vs M/O Defence on 12 March, 2025

matriculates. These references have not been rebutted in the written statement filed on behalf of the respondents. Even regarding the issue of being matriculate ... matriculation. The requirement that a Group C employee must be a matriculate, has come into force only after the recommendation of the 6th CPC
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashok Yadav vs M/O Defence on 12 March, 2025

matriculates. These references have not been rebutted in the written statement filed on behalf of the respondents. Even regarding the issue of being matriculate ... matriculation. The requirement that a Group C employee must be a matriculate, has come into force only after the recommendation of the 6th CPC
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shankar vs M/O Defence on 12 March, 2025

matriculates. These references have not been rebutted in the written statement filed on behalf of the respondents. Even regarding the issue of being matriculate ... matriculation. The requirement that a Group C employee must be a matriculate, has come into force only after the recommendation of the 6th CPC
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Balishter vs M/O Defence on 12 March, 2025

matriculates. These references have not been rebutted in the written statement filed on behalf of the respondents. Even regarding the issue of being matriculate ... matriculation. The requirement that a Group C employee must be a matriculate, has come into force only after the recommendation of the 6th CPC
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Raj Kumar vs M/O Defence on 12 March, 2025

matriculates. These references have not been rebutted in the written statement filed on behalf of the respondents. Even regarding the issue of being matriculate ... matriculation. The requirement that a Group C employee must be a matriculate, has come into force only after the recommendation of the 6th CPC
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next