admitted fact that the 3rd respondent was on deputation to
the Matsyafed for two years. The specific stipulation in the
Special Rules as to experience
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
2 THE DISTRICT OFFICER,
MATSYAFED, THRISSUR-4.
SR.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION ... revision
petitioner, the original complainant in this case is the
District Officer, Matsyafed, Thrissur, a public sector
company owned by the State. The learned counsel
SATHI
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & STATE :
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. THE DISTRICT MANAGER, MATSYAFED,
ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT- 688 001.
2. STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
MATSYFED, KOLLAM,
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER, K.C.SIVANAND,
PROJECT OFFICER, MATSYAFED DISTRICT OFFICE, KOLLAM.
2. STATE OF KERALA,
REP. BY THE DIRECTOR GENERAL