Arjun Katal vs State Of J&K And Anr on 24 August, 2020
Author
married to the petitioner No.4 on 08.05.2014. There
are allegations of demand of dowry, harassment and
torture etc. There is a matrimonial discord ... given by learned State
counsel before this Court that as of now charge sheet has
been filed only against petitioner
would have no interest in raising any demand for dowry or
causing any harassment to the 2nd respondent. Therefore, their
17
implication was a clear ... respondent is
having over enthusiasm and anxiety to seek conviction for
maximum people. The parents of the 2nd respondent have been
found to be making
applicant is father-in-law of the deceased, named as well as charge sheeted accused yet he is liable to be enlarged on bail. With ... regard to demand of additional dowry and commission of physical and mental cruelty upon deceased on account of non-fulfilment of additional demand of dowry
regard to demand of additional dowry and commission of physical and mental cruelty upon deceased on account of non-fulfilment of additional demand of dowry ... cannot be said to be the beneficiary of alleged demand of dowry. The police report (charge sheet) under Section 173 (2) has already been submitted
reveals from the perusal of the record that with the allegation of demand of dowry and causing harassment and cruelty to the victim ... victim including the present applicants on 15.9.2022 and after investigation charge sheet has been submitted in the matter. From the perusal of the record
demand for dowry has not be
proved. Under the circumstances, the case is not proved beyond reasonable
doubt. Alternatively, it was submitted that the maximum ... conclusion that the prosecution has been able to prove the
charge u/s 498A IPC, the following reasoning was given:-
"(i) That PW2 Umesh
father of the
complainant. She also mentioned that accused persons started demanding a flat from
her father. She also leveled allegation that ... gold articles to her but she came to know lateron that her
maximum jewelery was not given and she stated that her remaining jewelery
Arnesh Kumar vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 2 July, 2014
Equivalent citations: AIR
Vimal Kumar And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 28