April, 2020
on the ground that bills should not have incorporated maximum
demand charge fixed in terms of the agreement between the
Bihar State Power ... Central Government and the State Government,
and, therefore, demand of maximum demand charge is
unjustified.
7. Mr. Vinay Kiriti Singh, learned counsel appearing
on behalf
April, 2020
on the ground that bills should not have incorporated maximum
demand charge fixed in terms of the agreement between the
Bihar State Power ... Central Government and the State Government,
and, therefore, demand of maximum demand charge is
unjustified.
7. Mr. Vinay Kiriti Singh, learned counsel appearing
on behalf
April, 2020
on the ground that bills should not have incorporated maximum
demand charge fixed in terms of the agreement between the
Bihar State Power ... Central Government and the State Government,
and, therefore, demand of maximum demand charge is
unjustified.
7. Mr. Vinay Kiriti Singh, learned counsel appearing
on behalf
April, 2020
on the ground that bills should not have incorporated maximum
demand charge fixed in terms of the agreement between the
Bihar State Power ... Central Government and the State Government,
and, therefore, demand of maximum demand charge is
unjustified.
7. Mr. Vinay Kiriti Singh, learned counsel appearing
on behalf
having deposited the second installment in
time.
Leaving that aside, a further
demand was raised by the Respondent-
Electricity Distribution Company, which did not
find ... because of the
Industrial Incentive Policy, the maximum
demand charged by the respondent-Company
could not be questioned by him.
The petitioner continued
having deposited the second installment in
time.
Leaving that aside, a further
demand was raised by the Respondent-
Electricity Distribution Company, which did not
find ... because of the
Industrial Incentive Policy, the maximum
demand charged by the respondent-Company
could not be questioned by him.
The petitioner continued
unit for non-payment of the demand
raised by the respondent-SBPDCL under the head 'Maximum
Demand Charge' in the energy bill during ... payment of the
demand raised by the respondent-SBPDCL under the head
'Maximum Demand Charge' in the energy bill, dated
04.05.2020.
Patna High
electricity bill for the month of March,
2020 wherein the maximum demand charge has been levied for
the entire month even though the industrial unit ... 6170 of 2020(2) dt.10-06-2020
2/2
maximum demand charges.
5. In the above view of the matter, this Court
unit for non-payment of the demand
raised by the respondent-SBPDCL under the head 'Maximum
Demand Charge' in the energy bill during ... payment of the
demand raised by the respondent-SBPDCL under the head
'Maximum Demand Charge' in the energy bill, dated
04.05.2020.
Patna High
electricity bill for the month of March,
2020 wherein the maximum demand charge has been levied for
the entire month even though the industrial unit ... 6168 of 2020(2) dt.10-06-2020
2/2
maximum demand charges.
5. In the above view of the matter, this Court
