Hundred and Four Only) paid by the petitioner under the
head maximum demand charge at 4% covering the period from September ... case of High Tension supply of
electricity, consumption charge includes the charge on
maximum demand and power factor surcharge.
Explanation – If electricity is supplied
Hundred and Four Only) paid by the petitioner under the head
maximum demand charge at 4% covering the period from September ... case of High Tension supply of
electricity, consumption charge includes the charge on
maximum demand and power factor surcharge.
Explanation – If electricity is supplied
compensation. The same can be charged once. The levy of Maximum Demand Charge
in the penal bill is highly unreasonable and beyond the purview ... Section 126
inasmuch as the maximum demand is a fixed charge.
57. That it is submitted that if the petitioner has to pay the provisional
October, 2021 were raised without grant of proportionate
reduction/remission in maximum demand charge as mandated in terms
with Clause IX of Appendix ... bill for the aforesaid period so
far as it relates to Maximum Demand Charge be quashed and set aside.
Further prayer has been made
Mandamus, forbearing the 2nd and 3rd
respondents from demanding and collecting the tax on maximum demand
charge s from the petitioner ... demanding and collecting the tax on
2/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Nos.29943 & 29944 of 2017
maximum demand
Mandamus, forbearing the 2nd and 3rd
respondents from demanding and collecting the tax on maximum demand
charge s from the petitioner ... Mandamus, forbearing the 2nd
and 3rd respondents from demanding and collecting the tax on
maximum demand charges from the petitioner
Kumar City Residents Co-Operative ... vs Kumar Urban Development Pvt. Ltd. ... on 13 May, 2022
shortfall amount
with respect to Maximum Demand Charges in HTS Tariff i.e.,
Rs. 6,92,756/- was charged for the period of October ... calculation sheet. The shortfall
charges with respect to energy charges and Maximum Demand
Charges were assessed in terms with Clause 10.8 of the JSERC
Supply
significance as what is relevant is the contract demand
which is 250 KWA or a maximum demand.
4. It is not the case ... demand charges which have to be
calculated either on the basis of 75% of the contract demand or
actual maximum demand recorded in the meter
Induction Furnace Tariff.
iii) Since the respondents have increased the contract demand from
10500 KVA to 19233 KVA w.e.f.16.04.2000 ... basis of what
is recorded in the maximum demand indicated.
iv) From January, 2004, the contract demand has to be treated
