Kerala having come with the case
that they had only given permissive possession over the
property, the dispute regarding title was very much
there ... Constitution of India?
(III) Whether the learned Single Judge
committed error in declaring the Kovalam
Palace (Taking over by Resumption) Act,
2005 as ultra vires
Kerala having come with the case
that they had only given permissive possession over the
property, the dispute regarding title was very much
there ... Constitution of India?
(III) Whether the learned Single Judge
committed error in declaring the Kovalam
Palace (Taking over by Resumption) Act,
2005 as ultra vires
NEHA
Signing Date:22.09.2022
16:23:06
have committed a patent error in interpreting Para 20 as mandating the
revised price being liable ... manufacturer would have to face in case it breaches the 10% maximum
permissible limit. It was urged that in such a situation the manufacturer
becomes
error within his
jurisdiction and such error is not amenable to
correction by Courts as such error is not an
error on the face ... court
should not interfere with the award.
(vii) It is not permissible to a court to
examine the correctness of the findings of the
arbitrator
S. Kumar vs The District Collector
Author: M.Dhandapani
Bench: G.R.Swaminathan , M.Dhandapani
S. Kumar vs The District Collector
Author: M.Dhandapani
Bench: G.R.Swaminathan , M.Dhandapani
S. Kumar vs The District Collector
Author: M.Dhandapani
Bench: G.R.Swaminathan , M.Dhandapani
M/S.Subaya Constructions Company ... vs M/S.P & C Projects (P) Ltd on
authorities,
that in the guise of misinterpretation of the contract, and
consequent errors of jurisdiction, it is not possible to state
that the arbitral award ... dealt with
matters not allotted to him, this would be a jurisdictional
error which could be corrected on the ground of patent
illegality, which
authorities,
that in the guise of misinterpretation of the contract, and
consequent errors of jurisdiction, it is not possible to state
that the arbitral award ... dealt with
matters not allotted to him, this would be a jurisdictional
error which could be corrected on the ground of patent
illegality, which
