Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Present vs State Of Kerala 2008 (16) Scc _504 ; Where ... on 18 January, 2019 Bench

permissible for the High Court to interfere in the decision-making process. It is also equally well settled that it is not permissible ... warranted only when the decision impugned is vitiated by an apparent error of law i.e. when the error is apparent on the face

been relied upon by the authorities below and we see no error in the said finding. 26. Shri Joshi then urged that ... submitted that these statements being involuntary the authorities below have committed an error as well as illegality in relying upon these statements. This submission

which goes to the root of the matter. In other words, every error of law committed by the Arbitral Tribunal would not fall within ... Courts do not sit in appeal against the arbitral award. The permissible grounds for interference with a domestic award under Section

building permissions by invoking Rule 25 of the Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules and have recalled and revoked such building permissions granted within 30 meter ... February 2005 to submit that the development permission and building permissions are two independent permissions from two independent authorities, and the final sanction

building permissions by invoking Rule 25 of the Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules and have recalled and revoked such building permissions granted within 30 meter ... February 2005 to submit that the development permission and building permissions are two independent permissions from two independent authorities, and the final sanction

building permissions by invoking Rule 25 of the Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules and have recalled and revoked such building permissions granted within 30 meter ... February 2005 to submit that the development permission and building permissions are two independent permissions from two independent authorities, and the final sanction

building permissions by invoking Rule 25 of the Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules and have recalled and revoked such building permissions granted within 30 meter ... February 2005 to submit that the development permission and building permissions are two independent permissions from two independent authorities, and the final sanction

evidence to support the prosecution case. The trial Magistrate was clearly in error in assuming that the offence could be said to have been committed ... institution of the criminal case before the Magistrate after obtaining the permission of the Chief Officer was perfectly in order and it was not necessary

building permissions by invoking Rule 25 of the Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules and have recalled and revoked such building permissions granted within 30 meter ... February 2005 to submit that the development permission and building permissions are two independent permissions from two independent authorities, and the final sanction