instead of 270 kg/hr, which was said to be a typographical
error. In view of such irregularities, the Joint Chief Environment Engineer
(JCEE) recommended ... increased from 0.65 KLD to 2.0 KLD without securing any prior
permission. The 5th respondent also expanded its operations without following
building permissions by invoking
Rule 25 of the Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules and have recalled
and revoked such building permissions granted within 30 meter ... February 2005 to submit that the development permission
and building permissions are two independent permissions from two
independent authorities, and the final sanction
since Petitioner denied documents R-29 to R-53, Respondent also took
permission to lead evidence and both parties filed their affidavits of
witnesses ... counsel for the Petitioner contends that
the award suffers from a jurisdictional error as the Arbitrator has travelled
beyond the terms of reference
Unknown vs State Of Kerala 2008 _ on 23 January, 2019
Bench: K.Vinod Chandran , A
Pandya appearing for the defendant Board that this percentage is within the permissible limits. In support of this submission, Mr. Pandya has quoted relevant rule ... error are within the limits specified in the relevant Indian Standard Specification and where no such specification exists, the limits of error do not exceed
alter the conditions, fresh process
of tender was the only alternative permissible.
32. In West Bengal Electricity Board v. Patel
Engineering ... bill of quantities both in figures and words and as
such errors been confined to a case of either recording in
U.S Dollar equivalent
land, was chosen by the petitioner only,
accordingly, any failure to obtain permission from the State Government
in respect thereof cannot amount to Force Majeure ... performance by the
petitioner due to petitioner's intentional acts/errors/omissions under the
PPA.
25. He submits that the extension of time
Apex Court reiterated that, reappraisal
of evidence by the court is not permissible and as a matter of fact
exercise of power by the court ... said decision ,
the Apex Court held further that, the common phraseology 'error
apparent on the face of the record' does not itself, however
presence of excess colouring
matter is either flawed or suffers from an error of judgment.
8 It is further stated that the applicants have been ... coloring matter in manufacturing
of the instant food article is permissible as provided under the FSS
Act 2006. It is further stated that in certain
considered opinion
that it was not within the permissible limits of
interference for a Court of law, particularly when
there has been no allegation ... Whether a decision - making authority
exceeded its powers,
2. committed an error of law,
3. committed a breach of the rules of natural
justice
