held that the
interference with an arbitral award is permissible only when the
findings of the arbitrator are arbitrary, capricious or perverse or
OMP (Comm ... award, it does not act as a court of appeal and
consequently errors of fact cannot be corrected. A possible view
by the arbitrator
mandate in Section 17 of PC
Act requiring IO to take prior permission of the
Superintendent of Police, for adding any offence in the
charge ... accused cannot
be acquitted on this legal issue.
(B) Error in framing of Charge dated 03.08.2011
70.The Ld.Defence Counsel had challenged the legality
Dhampur Sugar Mills Ltd vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd on 25 June, 2021
In the
Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs City Sweep Services Llp on 8 August, 2025
-1-
DLCT010201402024
held that the
interference with an arbitral award is permissible only when the
findings of the arbitrator are arbitrary, capricious or perverse or
when conscience ... award, it does not act as a court of appeal and
consequently errors of fact cannot be corrected. A possible view
by the arbitrator
principles are that the decision of the
Arbitrator unless there is an error apparent on the face of the
award which makes it unsustainable ... Where the arbitrator assigns co-
gent grounds and sufficient reasons and no error of law or mis-
conduct is cited, the award will not call
choice of the parties and his decision, unless there is an error apparent on the
face of the award which makes it unsustainable ... Where the Arbitrator assigns cogent grounds and sufficient reasons and no
error of law or misconduct is cited, the award will not call for interference
choice of the parties and his decision, unless there is an error apparent on the
face of the award which makes it unsustainable ... Where the Arbitrator assigns cogent grounds and sufficient
reasons and no error of law or misconduct is cited, the award will not call for
interference
which goes to the root of
the matter. In other words, every error of law committed by the
Arbitral Tribunal would not fall within ... courts do
not sit in appeal against the arbitral award. The permissible
grounds for interference with a domestic award under Section
principles are that the decision of
the Arbitrator unless there is an error apparent on the face of the
award which makes it unsustainable ... Where the arbitrator assigns co-
gent grounds and sufficient reasons and no error of law or mis-
conduct is cited, the award will not call
