allowing more than `. 30 lakhs. This was
based on the permissible limit of remuneration payable to a company, under the
Companies Act . The asseesee ... services rendered. The CIT
(A) and the ITAT fell into error in interfering with the findings of the AO,
which were based on the appreciation
Harjinder Kaur vs State Of Punjab And Others on 1 August, 2012
Author: Paramjeet Singh
Whether, in the fact situation of the present case, that
approach was permissible or otherwise is, therefore, a question of law.
By no stretch ... 6584.11
Committee will have to be set aside - because of jurisdictional error
committed by the Evaluating Committee and the Standing Committee.
In our opinion
Monnet Ispat And Energy Ltd vs Union Of India And Ors on 26 July, 2012
The State Of Maharashtra vs Sayeed Mohd. Hanif Abdul Rahim on 10 February, 2012
Author
M/S. Dhariwal Industries Limited And ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 15
Lakshmi Matriculation School vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 3 May, 2012
Bench: R.Banumathi
Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Narsinghpur vs M/S. Shiv Shakti Khansari Udyog & Ors on
Nature Lovers' Forum Aged 41 Years vs State Of Kerala on 16 April, 2012
Tata Sky Limited vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 19 October, 2012
Bench: Chitra
