error was and who was responsible for that error. The only reason given in the SCN is that the appellant had permission to slaughter only
Collector Of Customs vs Mansingka Brothers on 26 November, 1986
Equivalent citations: 1987(13)ECR717
Customs on 23.1.95) informed the Customs that there was some error made and there was a second invoice which included the excess items, as found ... purpose on 23.1.95. The request on 16.1.95 (presented on 23.1.95) was for permission to amend the Bill of Entry, to include the quantity
been relied upon by the authorities below and we see no error in the said finding.
26. Shri Joshi then urged that ... submitted that these statements being involuntary the authorities below have committed an error as well as illegality in relying upon these statements. This submission
following the earlier decision in Global Agro Impex (supra) clearly committed an error. In the present case, the testing ... Basmati Rules inasmuch as the presence of other rice exceeded the maximum permissible limit of 20%, then the Customs Authority was bound by such report
Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) ... vs Union Of India & Ors. Etc. Etc on 6 December
Noor Aga vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 9 July, 2008
Equivalent citations: 2008
Union Of India vs M/S G.S. Chatha Rice Mills on 23 September, 2020
Union Of India vs M/S Raj Grow Impex Llp on 17 June, 2021
Equivalent
Sony India Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs, Icd, New Delhi on 28 May, 2002
Equivalent