briefly, the Table abounds in
such mistakes. Neither the tribunals nor the courts
can go by the ready reckoner. It can only be used ... thought it necessary to state the
correct legal position as courts and tribunals are
using higher multiplier as in the present case where
the Tribunal
filed a claim petition
No. 154 of 2003 before the Public Services Tribunal of Uttarakhand at
Dehradun (for short “the tribunal”) claiming that they were ... employees; and that the grievance put forth was hit by limitation.
The tribunal, after hearing the rival submissions urged before it,
came to hold that
facie
invalid, cannot be said to be raised before the arbitral
tribunal. For this purpose, inspiration has been drawn
from the authority in Walter ... arbitration shall be
Delhi, and the arbitration shall be conducted
in English language.
e. The award of the tribunal shall be final and
binding
multiple injuries. Two claim
petitions were filed before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (‘the
Tribunal’). One of them was by Smt. Jai Devi. The second ... transfer of the vehicle. The Second respondent stated before the
Tribunal that he sold the vehicle to the Third respondent on 18
September
appellant herein. Be it
stated, the Additional Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Indore had
awarded Rs.1,75,000/- in Claim Case No.181/2003 ... claim petition putting forth
the claim for Rs.4,50,000/-. The tribunal as stated earlier awarded a sum
of Rs.1,75,000/- with
Adhichini
property. He also relied upon the bye-laws of Municipal
Corporation of Delhi as per which where the value of
interest free security deposit ... rateable value of the property
fixed by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi vide its
assessment order dated 31.12.1996, as per which the
rateable value
passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal,
Principal Bench, New Delhi (for short “the tribunal”) in O.A.No.1977
of 2003 and the order dated ... said order of punishment was assailed by the respondent
before the tribunal on many a ground and the principal ground
propounded was that the advice
parties pertaining to remand of 21
the matter to the Tribunal after deliberation
of the legal issues
D. Reference of the dispute to the Tribunal ... Resources)
Chairman,
The Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal,
New Delhi‖
E. The initial proceedings before the Tribunal
28. During the pendency of the reference, the Government
Prakash Securities Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Life Insurance Corp. of India
& Anr.14; N.P. Berry Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation15 ; State ... Sizerali Mohamedali Lodhia Vs.
Gujarat State Road Transport Corp.18 .
17. Reliance has been placed also on the other decisions of the
High Courts dealing
whereby the
orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench,
Chandigarh (for short “the tribunal”) dated 8.1.1990 and 23.9.1998 were
assailed has redeemed ... requisite parameters
of law by lancinating both the orders of the tribunal and further issuing
directions to recast the seniority list of Head Constables
