Collector’s order dated 25.3.1992 before CEGAT. On 23.6.1998, the
Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the order of the
Collector dated ... judgment dated 23.6.1998 passed
by the Customs, Excise And Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal,
West Regional Bench at Mumbai.
Facts briefly stated are that the respondent
whether the right of appeal
under Section 30 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (hereinafter
referred to as the 'ct'), against ... order of Armed Forces Tribunal
(hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal') with the leave of the Tribunal
under Section
appeals are outcome of the awards made by the
Motor Accident Claims Tribunals (for short "the Tribunals") in
various claim petitions, which were ... Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 18:23:34 :::HCHP
-: 13 :-
Tribunals, while making the impugned awards, have held that the
driver of the offending vehicle
challenging the award dated 26.05.1999 passed by the Industrial
Tribunal, Tamil Nadu, in I.D. No.66 of 1991, wherein it was held that ... Bharat Bank Ltd., Delhi v. The Employees of the
Bharat Bank Ltd., Delhi & the Bharat Bank Employee 's Union, Delhi[7], the
relevant
refer to Sections 305 to 307 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act,
1957 (MCD Act) ( as also to Sections ... Delhi
Municipal Council Act, 1994 (NDMC Act)) which empower the
Municipality to define a line on one or both sides of any public
appointed
shall appoint a third arbitrator, the decision of the three-man
tribunal thus constituted or any two of them, shall be final. On
receipt ... Shipping
LLC appointed Mr.Edward Mocatta as a chairman of the arbitral tribunal.
8. The respondents simultaneously commenced the arbitration proceedings
against the petitioners herein
file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Additional District Court), Dharmapuri.
For Appellant : Mr.M.B.Gopalan
For Respondents ... years, as per Sarla Verma v. Delhi Transport Corporation Ltd. , reported in 2009 (2) TNMAC 1, the Tribunal applied '11' multiplier and computed
writ jurisdiction (See Rashid Ahmed v.
Municipal Board, Kairana , 1950 SCR 566).
11. In Whirlpool Corpn. v. Registrar of Trade Marks ... Having said so, we have gone through the orders
passed by the Tribunal. The only determination made by
the Tribunal is with regard
whereby waqf suit instituted by the petitioner
before one member Waqf Tribunal has been held to be not maintainable and
necessary directions have been issued ... Baba Dargah Trust, instituted
the suit before the one member Maharashtra Waqf Tribunal, Aurangabad (in
short, “the Tribunal”) claiming the suit property as waqf property
orders
passed in the appeal, are further appealable to the Tribunal.
Section 48 of the HP VAT Act, 2005 further provides that the order ... writ jurisdiction (See Rashid Ahmed v.
Municipal Board, Kairana, 1950 SCR 566).
11. In Whirlpool Corpn. v. Registrar of Trade Marks
