Meera Bhanja vs Nirmala Kumari Choudhury on 16 November, 1994
Equivalent citations: 1995 AIR 455, 1995 SCC (1) 170, AIR 1995 SUPREME COURT ... Majmudar
Bench: S.B Majmudar , B.P. Jeevan Reddy
PETITIONER:
MEERA BHANJA
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
NIRMALA KUMARI CHOUDHURY
DATE OF JUDGMENT16/11/1994
BENCH:
MAJMUDAR
Meera Bhanja vs Smt. Nirmala Kumari Choudhury on 16 November, 1995
Equivalent citations: AIR1995SC455, 1995(43)BLJR892, JT1994(7)SC536, 1995(0)MPLJ494
under : (SCC pp. 83-84)
"14. In Meera Bhanja v. Nirmala Kumari
Choudhury [Meera Bhanja v. Nirmala Kumari
Choudhury ... Aribam Pishak Sharma , (1979)
4 SCC 389] has been followed in Meera
Bhanja [Meera Bhanja v. Nirmala Kumari Choudhury ,
(1995) 1 SCC 170] . In that
under : (SCC pp. 83-84)
"14. In Meera Bhanja v. Nirmala Kumari
Choudhury [Meera Bhanja v. Nirmala Kumari
Choudhury ... Aribam Pishak Sharma , (1979)
4 SCC 389] has been followed in Meera
Bhanja [Meera Bhanja v. Nirmala Kumari Choudhury ,
(1995) 1 SCC 170] . In that
view of their contention the counsel have relied upon Meera Bhanja v. Smt. Nirmala Kumari Choudary, A.I.R. 1995 S.C. 455 wherein ... also explained in the taw laid down above in the Meera Bhanja Case. Further the issues were very much framed in the present case
held by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the
case of Meera Bhanja v. Nirmala Kumari Choudhury, reported
in (1995) 1 SCC 170, specially ... corrected, but lies only for patent
error."
8. Again, in Meera Bhanja v. Nirmala Kumari Choudhury
while quoting with approval a passage from Aribam
same, reliance can be placed on the
Judgement of Meera Bhanja (Smt.) v. Nirmala Kumari Choudury (Smt. ),
(1995) 1 SCC 170, wherein ... held in paragraph 14 to 18 as under :
―14. In Meera Bhanja v. Nirmala Kumari
Choudhury , (1995) 1 SCC 170 it was held that
held by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Meera Bhanja v. Nirmala Kumari Choudhury , reported in (1995) 1 SCC
170, specially ... corrected, but lies only for
patent error."
8. Again, in Meera Bhanja v. Nirmala Kumari Choudhury while
quoting with approval a passage from Aribam
held by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Meera Bhanja v. Nirmala Kumari Choudhury , reported in (1995) 1 SCC
170, specially ... corrected, but lies only for
patent error."
8. Again, in Meera Bhanja v. Nirmala Kumari Choudhury while
quoting with approval a passage from Aribam
lies only for patent
error."
(emphasis ours)
8. Again, in Meera Bhanja v. Nirmala Kumari
Choudhury [(1995) 1 SCC 170] while quoting with approval
