decided first to verify the demand
of illegal gratification. A new memory card was inserted in digital
voice recorder. The complainant made a phone call ... went to appellant no.1's office. As
planned, the memory card with Digital Voice Recorder (D.V.R.) was
with the complainant
decided first to verify the demand
of illegal gratification. A new memory card was inserted in digital
voice recorder. The complainant made a phone call ... went to appellant no.1's office. As
planned, the memory card with Digital Voice Recorder (D.V.R.) was
with the complainant
necessary for him to seize the mobile phone or memory card
containing the recorded discussion. He admits that the mobile phone
and memory card were ... company seized from accused no. 1
was not having memory card. The evidence of PW8 - Vikas Daulatrao
Wagh show that there were improvements / omissions
Ambhure recorded by the co-accused
himself and preserved in the memory card is concerned, learned
Senior Counsel for the applicant would submit that ... support of
the talks which has been preserved in the memory card. The
memory card did not contain the original conversation. On the
question
settled. The said
conversation was recorded in the memory card of digital voice
recorder. The memory card of the said conversation was taken into
custody ... applicant
was also recorded there with the digital voice recorder. Its memory
card was seized. Trap Panchanama was drawn up. Thereafter, the
report was lodged
2022 20:29:00 :::
5 14-BA.711 of 2022
cellphone (memory card) of the applicant. He even could have
retrieved the same from
Sayyed Gaus Sayyed Noor vs The State Of Maharashtra on 4 July, 2024
Author: R
The State Of Maharashtra vs Sachin S/O. Vitthal Suryawanshi And ... on 4 July, 2024
The State Of Maharashtra vs Sachin S/O. Vitthal Suryawanshi And ... on 4 July, 2024
Sachin S/O. Vitthal Suryawanshi And ... vs The State Of Maharashtra on 4 July, 2024
