Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Shridhar Gangaram Chavan vs The State Of Maharashtra on 13 October, 2015 Author: V.M

given the most minute details without referring to any documents for refreshing his memory. For instance, he has given the ration card number of Ravindra ... given by the witness, without referring to any document for refreshing his memory, and, only on the basis of his memory. Tupe has also given

panchanama (Exh. 29), which he has read before giving evidence. 18] Refreshing memory by the witness cannot have any objection, however, such reading ... document for refreshing the memory has to be done in the presence of the court. Such is the view of learned Single Judge of this

permission to refresh ::: Uploaded on - 08/12/2015 ::: Downloaded on - 09/12/2015 00:00:14 ::: apeal630.93 22 his memory, but that objection

panch witness. It could also be used by a panch for refreshing his memory if the conditions mentioned in section 159 of the Evidence

exact talk between him and the accused', instead of refreshing his memory with the permission of the Court by playing over the recorded conversation

Kiran S/O Umraoji Kaithe And Another (In ... vs The State Of Maharashtra, Through ... on

Smt. Vijaya Dilipsinghraje Shirke vs State Of Maharashtra, Through P.S.O. ... on 26 June

Ayubkhan S/O Amirkhan Pathan vs The State Of Maharashtra, Through ... on 26 June, 2015

Smt. Vijaya Dilipsinghraje Shirke vs State Of Maharashtra, Through P.S.O. ... on 26 June