which is admittedly owned by
the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority
(MHADA), a statutory authority constituted under the
Maharashtra Housing and Area Development ... MHADA
Act ). There is however, a dispute between the contesting parties
as to whether the property bearing CTS No.190/9 (pt.)
admeasuring
which is admittedly owned by
the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority
(MHADA), a statutory authority constituted under the
Maharashtra Housing and Area Development ... MHADA
Act ). There is however, a dispute between the contesting parties
as to whether the property bearing CTS No.190/9 (pt.)
admeasuring
road as required by the
Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority
("MHADA"), which was then designated as the Special Planning
Authority ... January 1988 addressed by the Collector of Solapur to the
Administrator of MHADA. This letter speaks about negotiations
with the landowners and records that
road as required by the
Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority
("MHADA"), which was then designated as the Special Planning
Authority ... January 1988 addressed by the Collector of Solapur to the
Administrator of MHADA. This letter speaks about negotiations
with the landowners and records that
road as required by the
Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority
("MHADA"), which was then designated as the Special Planning
Authority ... January 1988 addressed by the Collector of Solapur to the
Administrator of MHADA. This letter speaks about negotiations
with the landowners and records that
state
for respondent- Mr. P. G. Lad, a/w Ms. Sayli Apte,
mhada Ms. Shreya Shah.
CORAM : M. S. Sonak &
Kamal Khata, JJ.
RESERVED ... Special Land
Acquisition Officer (SLAO), Maharashtra Housing and Area
Development Authority ("MHADA") (Respondent No.3), the
Petitioner's said property was acquired
Kataria.
for respondent- Ms Sayli Apte, with Shreya Shah.
mhada
for respondent-bmc Mr Bhavik Manek, with S
Tondwalkar.
Present-in-person Mr Yuvraj Chavan ... Petitioners were informed
that the OC was withheld because Respondent No. 2 (MHADA)
had not granted the final No Objection Certificate (NOC). The
BMC communicated
respondents 2 Mr P G Lad, with Sayli Apte, Shreya
to 4 - mhada. Shah.
CORAM : M.S.Sonak&
Arif S. Doctor, JJ.
RESERVED ... along with Ms Sayli Apte and Ms Shreya Shah for
the respondent - MHADA (respondents 2 to 4). The 5th respondent
was duly served. Mr Pandey
Kataria.
for respondent- Ms Sayli Apte, with Shreya Shah.
mhada
for respondent-bmc Mr Bhavik Manek, with S
Tondwalkar.
Present-in-person Mr Yuvraj Chavan ... Petitioners were informed
that the OC was withheld because Respondent No. 2 (MHADA)
had not granted the final No Objection Certificate (NOC). The
BMC communicated
Commissioner Konkan Division after initiating
Departmental Enquiry against the applicant, he
requested MHADA official under his letter dated
18/9/1989 to make the original ... case papers available
along with MHADA's remarks on the reply dated
1/9/89 filed by the applicant. The MHADA under their
letter
