Aqualite India Ltd. 2019
SCC OnLine Del 7409 and Micolube India Ltd. Vs. Saurabh
Industries (2013) 199 DLT 740 (FB). The same will
where they admit to
such inspiration.
4
Reliance was placed on: Micolube India Ltd. v. Rakesh Kumar trading as Saurabh Industries
reliance on the decisions reported as 150
( 2008) DLT 458 Micolube India Ltd. vs. Maggon Auto Centre & Ors. and
Travellers Exchange Corporation
Hardwares , AIR
2013 Del 143: 2013 ( 55) PTC 61 (Del) and Micolube India Limited v.
Rakesh Kumar
prior publication made. The following passage of the Delhi High Court in MICOLUBE INDIA LIMITED VS. RAKESH KUMAR AT MIPR (2013(2) 0156), would emphasise
been wrongly arrayed as a
party in view of the Judgment of Micolube India Ltd v.
Maggon Auto Center
Caprihans (India) Pvt. Ltd. AIR 1966 Calcutta 247 and on Micolube
India Limited Vs. Maggon Auto Centre 2010 (42) PTC 462 (Del.) to contend
that ... upon by the counsel for the defendants in this regard i.e. Micolube
India Limited supra to have considered the said aspect. The reasoning given
Prop. of Mourya Industries V/s. Sona Paint
& Hardwares AND Micolube India Ltd. V/s. Rakesh Kumar reported in
2013(55) PTC-61 (Delhi
counsel for the defendants submitted
that the majority view of 'Micolube
India Limited Vs. Rakesh Kumar
Trading & Ors. ' coupled with the
Calcutta
injunction. In a recent decision of this Court in the case of Micolube India
Ltd. v. Maggon Auto Centre and Anr. MANU/DE/0180/2008