incorporated under the
Provisions of Indian Companies Act, 1956 ,
Fugro House, D-222/30,
TTC Industrial Area,
MIDC, Nerul, Navi Mumbai-400 706,
Maharashtra. ... Respondent ... Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act, against the order dated 30.01.2013 in Company Petition
incorporated under the
Provisions of Indian Companies Act, 1956 ,
Fugro House, D-222/30,
TTC Industrial Area,
MIDC, Nerul, Navi Mumbai-400 706,
Maharashtra. ... Respondent ... Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act, against the order dated 30.01.2013 in Company Petition
Road, MIDC, Andheri East,
Mumbai - 400 093. ... Petitioner
Vs.
Raghavan AE ... Respondent
PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act ... Star,
Central Road, MIDC, Andheri East,
Mumbai - 400 093. ... Respondent
PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act
Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956
and having its Registered office at
A-21, MIDC, Andheri (E), Mumbai-400 093. ...Petitioner
Vs.
The Executive ... petitioner is that the petitioner company is
registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and is an ISO 9001 certified
company, engaged in manufacturing and supplying
M/S.Travel News Services (India) ... vs Airports Authority Of India (Southern ... on 11 August
hold that section 52-A of the MRTP Act
(Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966)
shall be read down to mean that non obstante ... Development
Plans/Regional Plans under the MRTP Act and the
Development Control Regulations framded under the
MRTP Act. Hence, by exercising the power under
Section
Indure Private Limited
A Company incorporated under the
provisions of Indian Companies Act
represented by its Director,
Indure House,
Greater Kailash-II,
New Delhi ... MIDC Industrial Estate,
Butibori-441 122,
Nagpur, Maharashtra State. .. Respondents
Appeals filed under Section 37(1)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation
Act, 1996 against
Constitutional right under
Article 300A vide the Constitution (44th Amendment) Act, 1978 . The
Parliamentary intent was clear, yet it ended up becoming an optical illusion ... Constitution (Forty-Fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 , however, it continued
to be a human right [Tukaram Kana Joshi v. MIDC
Constitutional right under
Article 300A vide the Constitution (44th Amendment) Act, 1978 . The
Parliamentary intent was clear, yet it ended up becoming an optical illusion ... Constitution (Forty-Fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 , however, it
continued to be a human right [Tukaram Kana Joshi v. MIDC
Constitutional right under
Article 300A vide the Constitution (44th Amendment) Act, 1978 . The
Parliamentary intent was clear, yet it ended up becoming an optical illusion ... Constitution (Forty-Fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 , however, it
continued to be a human right [Tukaram Kana Joshi v. MIDC
