Saurav Yadav vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 18 December, 2020
Saurav Yadav vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 18 December, 2020
Equivalent citations: AIR
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 208 (1.70 seconds)Deepak Kumar And Ors. vs District And Sessions Judge, Delhi And ... on 12 September, 2012
certificates
of their parents issued by other States and have migrated to
Delhi, cannot avail the benefit. Thus, the view expressed by the
tribunal that ... Scheduled
Tribes, alone would be entitled to the benefits, and those migrating from one
state to another, cannot enjoy such benefits. The decision in Pushpa
Jay Prakash vs State Of Rajasthan on 9 August, 2019
against
general category vacancies; the State had relied upon the rule of
migration, in terms of which if candidates applying under a
reserved category ... accordance with law.
70. This Court holds that the migration of reserved category
into General Category is a settled phenomenon of law, and
the reservation
Laxmi Devi vs State Of Rajasthan on 9 August, 2019
against
general category vacancies; the State had relied upon the rule of
migration, in terms of which if candidates applying under a
reserved category ... accordance with law.
70. This Court holds that the migration of reserved category
into General Category is a settled phenomenon of law, and
the reservation
Shankar Lal vs State Of Rajasthan on 9 August, 2019
against
general category vacancies; the State had relied upon the rule of
migration, in terms of which if candidates applying under a
reserved category ... accordance with law.
70. This Court holds that the migration of reserved category
into General Category is a settled phenomenon of law, and
the reservation
Kavita Khorwal vs The Delhi University & Ors. on 3 November, 2008
conditions which
were applicable for reservation of seats in case of migration of Scheduled Castes &
Scheduled Tribes from one state to another. Para ... said order is reproduced as
under:
"Where a person migrates from one state to another, he can claim to
belong
Mohanlal Bohra vs State Of Rajasthan on 9 August, 2019
against
general category vacancies; the State had relied upon the rule of
migration, in terms of which if candidates applying under a
reserved category ... accordance with law.
70. This Court holds that the migration of reserved category
into General Category is a settled phenomenon of law, and
the reservation
Jitendra Kumar Sharma vs State Of Rajasthan on 9 August, 2019
against
general category vacancies; the State had relied upon the rule of
migration, in terms of which if candidates applying under a
reserved category ... accordance with law.
70. This Court holds that the migration of reserved category
into General Category is a settled phenomenon of law, and
the reservation
Sharda Devi vs State Of Rajasthan on 9 August, 2019
against
general category vacancies; the State had relied upon the rule of
migration, in terms of which if candidates applying under a
reserved category ... accordance with law.
70. This Court holds that the migration of reserved category
into General Category is a settled phenomenon of law, and
the reservation
Ajay Dharu vs State Of Rajasthan on 9 August, 2019
against
general category vacancies; the State had relied upon the rule of
migration, in terms of which if candidates applying under a
reserved category ... accordance with law.
70. This Court holds that the migration of reserved category
into General Category is a settled phenomenon of law, and
the reservation