Theni
New Bus Stand.
4.The learned Special Government Pleader vehemently opposed the
extension of mini bus service upto Theni New Bus stand ... Maximum number - 728
b)Mini b)Minimum number - 367
Semi Saloon
c)Type - -
Single dock
Ordinary/ Town Bus Mini Bus Passenger/
Mofussil Goods Carriage
that the
third respondent, without a valid permit, is also operating her mini
bus bearing Registration No.TN 45 N 0344 from Kuzhithalai bus stand ... operate her mini bus from
Kuzhithalai bus stand without a valid permit, the petitioner's business
interest as a mini bus operator, having
regular as well as a mini bus. It cannot be disputed that
a mini bus operation being a stage carriage has to
necessarily operate ... Rules,
defining a 'mini bus' to mean a stage carriage, further
strengthens the position that a mini bus operation can
only be considered
bus operator of the bus bearing Reg.No. TN 57 E 5130,
plying on the route Srirangam Girls Higher Secondary School upto
Rajagopuram Bus stop ... petitioner.
6. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that
operating mini bus only in the permitted route is very difficult, as he is
unable
Government, in the year 1997, introduced a Mini bus
scheme which permitted running of the Mini Bus for the benefit of the
rural people ... acceptable. As per the
old scheme, the 3rd respondent has been operating mini bus
with an overlapping distance of not exceeding 1km on the
served
Chrishtopher Bus Stand, while plying on the route from Nagercoil
Anna Stadium to Parakkai, was rejected.
2. The petitioner is a Mini Bus Operator permitted ... mini bus operators to enter the bus stand, if the bus stand is on the route
it plies. But, in this case, the bus stand
renewal of the permit filed by the petitioner in respect of mini bus
TN 58/E-1783 plying on the route “Government Rajaji Hospital ... Advocate
(in all writ petitions)
COMMON ORDER
The writ petitioners are mini bus operators. They were
granted permit under the 1997 Scheme in January
present revision petition has been filed by a stage carriage
mini bus operator challenging an order passed by the State Transport
Appellate Tribunal ... petitioner had operated the mini bus on a different route
other than the permitted route.
(b). As per history sheet during the period between
thereafter, several litigations in between the petitioner
Corporation and the mini bus operator and the earlier order
passed by the 1st respondent Tribunal in Appeal ... considering the objections, the 3 rd
respondent has rejected the operation of the mini bus permit in
the above said route. Further, recently, the petitioner
Sivaram
ORDER
The petitioner is a Mini Bus operator and runs a Mini Bus
bearing Registration No.TN-33-N-0238. He seeks amendment ... impleaded themselves in
the writ petition as respondents. They are private Mini Bus
Operators, who state that their business would very much be
impacted
