interview was only for eighteen marks and not twenty-five, their
marks in the interview should be extrapolated as a percentage of eighteen marks ... interview marks, i.e., eighteen for actual interview and seven for
certificates was never indicated in the advertisement. Consequently, reduction of the
actual interview marks
marks given below :
(A) Written test : 60 marks
(B) Interview : 20 marks
(C) Performance Appraisal : 20 marks
Reports.
Total marks : 100 marks
(A)Written test ... marks given
below :
(A) Written test : 70 marks
(B) Interview : 20 marks
(C) Performance Appraisal : 10 marks
Reports.
Total marks : 100 marks
(A) Written test
interview. Hence, after careful consideration the Commission
decides that to get out of the maximum 30 marks of the
interview, 10 marks as minimum qualifying ... also prescribe the minimum marks,
as stated above. But if the Selection Committee wants to
prescribe minimum marks for interview, it should do so before
marks; 2. Language (i) Translation was of 50 marks, (ii) Precis of 50 marks; and 3. Interview was of 20 marks. No minimum passing marks ... there was prescription of minimum marks for written test only and not for viva-voce. However, minimum marks for the interview cannot be prescribed either
marks; 2. Language (i) Translation was of 50 marks, (ii) Precis of 50 marks; and 3. Interview was of 20 marks. No minimum passing marks ... there was prescription of minimum marks for written test only and not for viva-voce. However, minimum marks for the interview cannot be prescribed either
marks; 2. Language (i) Translation was of 50 marks, (ii) Precis of 50 marks; and 3. Interview was of 20 marks. No minimum passing marks ... there was prescription of minimum marks for written test only and not for viva-voce. However, minimum marks for the interview cannot be prescribed either
marks for Employment Seniority and 5 marks for interview and altogether he obtained 22 marks out of 50 marks. However, the interview committee fixed minimum
minimum cut off marks; and when a number of candidates in terms of the ratio fixed did not qualify with minimum cut off marks, they ... held that merely applicants did not qualify with minimum cut off marks fixed by the Commission for screening test, they cannot be held
changed inasmuch as the ratio between the written
examination marks and interview marks was also changed. This fact
would appear from paragraph ... Supreme Court held introduction of requirement of minimum
marks for interview after the entire selection process (consisting of
written examination and interview) was completed would
prescribe minimum/ cut
off marks for the viva voce which was placed before the full Court
which approved 55% as the minimum qualifying marks ... total marks
obtained in Paper I). Candidates will have to
obtain the minimum marks as will be decided by
the corporation in the interview. Candidates
