Roopakala Prasad vs The University Grants Commission on 17 December, 2012
Roopakala Prasad vs The University Grants Commission on 17 December, 2012
Author: T.R.Ramachandran
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 512 (1.05 seconds)Roopakala Prasad vs The University Grants Commission on 17 December, 2012
Roopakala Prasad vs The University Grants Commission on 17 December, 2012
Author: T.R.Ramachandran
Roopakala Prasad vs The University Grants Commission on 17 December, 2012
Roopakala Prasad vs The University Grants Commission on 17 December, 2012
Author: T.R.Ramachandran
Neeraj Kant & Anr vs State & Ors on 13 January, 2012
interview for the personality test carrying 20 marks; and the
minimum qualifying marks in such interview were fixed at 7
[35% of the maximum marks ... Rule fixing minimum qualifying marks for and
viva-voce examination and restored the position of
providing requirement of minimum marks in
interview for selection
Ravindra Nath Rai And Others vs Chairman, Purvanchal Gramin Bank And ... on 10 February, 2012
marks for seniority, 10 marks for qualifications, 20 marks for interview and 56 marks for performance. Out of total number of 120 marks, the maximum ... test, interview and five years Performance Appraisal Reports as per the division of marks given below:-
70 marks
20 marks
10 marks
100 marks
Surekha Dashrath Kolhe vs Gujarat University on 18 September, 2012
also prescribe the minimum
marks, stated above. But if the Selection Committee want to prescribe
minimum marks for interview, it should do so before ... that previous procedure was not to have
any minimum marks for viva voce. Therefore, prescribing minimum marks
for viva voce was not permissible
Sreeja.S vs State Of Kerala on 12 October, 2012
prescribed earlier. The previous procedure was not to have any
minimum marks for interview. Therefore, extending the
minimum marks prescribed for written examination, to
interviews ... also prescribe the
minimum marks, stated above. But if the Selection Committee
want to prescribe minimum marks for interview, it should do so
before
Sri M Ramachandra S/O Muniappa vs The Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd on 30 August, 2012
marks for the 3 years should also
be 50 marks or above. Official should also secure minimum
marks in online test and interview. Though ... method of fixing minimum marks in the interview. But, for
securing less than 15 marks in the interview, the petitioner
could have been promoted
Punjab Gramin Bank & Another vs Naresh Kumar & Others on 9 August, 2012
promotion by fixing 40% marks out of 20 marks
for interview, that is, 8 marks as the minimum qualifying marks for
interview for the general ... marks for interview i.e. 8 marks out of 20 marks for general
category. The Rule was changed after declaration of result but before
interview
Shri Ravi Rai vs Commissioner on 25 July, 2012
selection can prescribe by rules the minimum marks both for written examination and vive-voce, but if minimum marks are not prescribed for vive-voce ... also prescribe the minimum marks, as stated above. But if the Selection Committee wants to prescribe minimum marks for interview, it should do so before