induction cooker. The DRI on verification found that the values
were mis-declared and issued show cause notice stating that MRP was
not declared ... undervalued all the three
consignments by suppressing the actual value
and willfully mis-declaring the description of
goods as spares in order to evade payment
provisional assessment. Thereafter, the subsequent
consignments not cleared citing that it is mis-declaration and wrong
classification.
11. He further submitted that the Principal Bench ... final conclusion
on his assessment. The petitioner has given a mis-declaration and is insisting
on the same for getting benefits. The invoice value
provisional assessment. Thereafter, the subsequent
consignments not cleared citing that it is mis-declaration and wrong
classification.
11. He further submitted that the Principal Bench ... final conclusion
on his assessment. The petitioner has given a mis-declaration and is insisting
on the same for getting benefits. The invoice value
provisional assessment. Thereafter, the subsequent
consignments not cleared citing that it is mis-declaration and wrong
classification.
11. He further submitted that the Principal Bench ... final conclusion
on his assessment. The petitioner has given a mis-declaration and is insisting
on the same for getting benefits. The invoice value
provisional assessment. Thereafter, the subsequent
consignments not cleared citing that it is mis-declaration and wrong
classification.
11. He further submitted that the Principal Bench ... final conclusion
on his assessment. The petitioner has given a mis-declaration and is insisting
on the same for getting benefits. The invoice value
respondent is that the 1st petitioner/A1 in this case
mis-declared the goods viz., 36,000 number of ordinary Banians as T-Shirts
