driver guilty of all charges.
5. It was found that the proved misconduct was serious in nature and the Disciplinary Authority came to the provisional ... satisfactory. While awarding punishment the respondent also took notice of several past misconduct and hence the order of dismissal was legal and binding. The dismissal
authority overlooked the very admission of the employee for having committed the misconduct in question, for which he was charged. In this regard, the decision ... since the charges are separate and each of them constitute a serious misconduct of the employee, even if the order of dismissal is based
quarters. The three charges were framed purporting to be a misconduct under the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Discipline Appeal Regulations applicable to officers. However ... which said charges are framed to be correct, do they constitute a misconduct under para 30 of the Standing Orders?
(C) Whether the imposition
permission. A show cause cum charge memo dated 27.1.93 was issued for misconduct enumerated under the Standing Order No. 23(6) of the Certified Standing ... employee proposing the punishment of dismissal considering the gravity of the misconduct as well as the past record. The said notice was received
certain complaints regarding the
irregularities committed by the respondent as also the misconduct, the
respondent came to be terminated by the petitioner by order dated ... giving any reasonable cause and
also without finding him guilty of any misconduct and as such the order was in
violation
challenge the enquiry.
2.8. The Tribunal endorsed the finding of misconduct perhaps because
those findings were never challenged before it. The finding of the Tribunal ... appellant was correct .
Ultimately, the Tribunal held that though the misconduct was proved, which was
the subject-matter of the first charge, the third charge
memorandum proposing to hold an enquiry against him on the imputations of misconduct which were set out in the annexure to that memorandum. The Articles ... competent authority. This act of Constable S.K. Das tantamounts to gross misconduct and dereliction of duties being a member of an Armed Force.
Article
doubt and the standard of proof
required to prove the charge of misconduct in departmental proceeding is not
the same as required to prove ... event of acquittal, the competent authority may proceed
against the delinquent regarding misconduct and if after enquiry it is decided
not to continue the employee
quarters. The three
charges were framed purporting to be a misconduct under the Tamil Nadu
Electricity Board Discipline Appeal Regulations applicable to officers.
However ... which said charges are framed to be correct, do they constitute a
misconduct under para 30 of the Standing Orders?
(C) Whether the imposition
employment who has been found guilty of a serious charge of misconduct of the nature of a theft or misappropriation of the property belonging ... award a lesser punishment even if the employer had proved the misconduct against the delinquent.
12. In Coimbatore Periyar District Dravida Panchalai Thozilalar Munnetra Sangam
