employee of the petitioners' institution and, on the ground of misconduct he was suspended from his service from 24.11.1992. The charge sheet was served ... superannuation was liable to be dealt with departmentally for any misconduct, negligence or financial irregularities committed by him during the period of his service
unless the post itself is abolished or unless he is guilty of misconduct, negligence, inefficiency or other disqualifications and appropriate proceedings are taken under ... expiry of that period unless he has been guilty of some misconduct, negligence, in. efficiency or other disqualifications and appropriate proceedings are taken under
point of victimisation in relation to the punishment imposed for the alleged misconduct by merely observing that the same is neither pleaded nor proved. Thirdly ... However, when looking to the nature of the charge of even major misconduct which is found proved if the punishment of dismissal or discharge
conduct of domestic enquiry or with undue haste;
(g) for misconduct of a minor or technical character, without having any regard to the nature ... particular misconduct or the past record of service of the employee, so as to amount to a shockingly disproportionate punishment."
4. The Labour Court
petitioners to impose punishment instead of dismissal from service for the misconduct proved under Standing Orders 20(k) and 20(zi) while treating the respondent ... challenge is that even assuming that the materials on record establish the misconduct in the form of loan transaction between the employees, the said misconduct
amount of Rs. 30,315/-. In other words, the charge of misconduct relating to misappropriation of Government money to the tune ... servant who is removed or required to retire from Government service for misconduct or insolvency shall be granted no pension other than a Compassionate pension
this conduct of the
Petitioner, he was chargesheeted on 5.6.1994 for the
misconduct punishable under Section 9(b) and 9(e) of the
CRPF ... Petitioner was informed that he would be proceeded with
for the misconduct punishable under Section 11(1) of the
CRPF Act, 1949 instead of Sections
probationer but the same is an order terminating service for misconduct. It is his submission that the petitioner cannot be said to be probationer ... services otherwise terminated unless the Authorities hold enquiry into the misconduct, if any, against him. In substance, it is the contention of Mr. Pradhan that
chargesheet on 13.5.1985 alleging that
he had committed on act of misconduct of producing a
false and bogus School Leaving Certificate at the
time ... material before him the Inquiry
Officer recorded a finding that the misconduct
alleged against the Respondent-employee was proved.
The Respondent-employee was thereafter dismissed
ground that there was no evidence on record to prove the alleged misconduct on the part of the petitioner in relation to the alleged misbehaviour ... Court below overlooking the same erred in holding that there was misconduct on the part of the petitioner and thereby to set aside the order
