Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 484 (0.05 seconds)

Rahul Kaushik vs The Secretary on 18 November, 2016

grounds for inquiring into the truth of any imputation of misconduct or misbehaviour against a Government servant, it may itself inquire into, or appoint under ... drawn up- (i) the substance of the imputations of misconduct or misbehaviour into definite and distinct articles of charge; (ii) a statement of the imputations
Madras High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Promod Kumar Ips vs State Of Tamil Nadu

Disciplinary Authority to draw up a statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehaviour into definite and distinct articles of charge. Since the term used ... drawn up- (i) the substance of the imputations of misconduct or misbehaviour into definite and distinct articles of charge; (ii) a statement of the imputations

The Management Of Ashok Leyland Limited vs The Presiding Officer, Iii Additional ... on 1 September, 1994

discipline amongst the employees would constitute misconduct; rowdy conduct in the course of working hours would constitute misconduct, misbehaviour committed even outside working hours ... categories of misconduct, it cannot be reasonably disputed that acts which are subversive of discipline amongst employees or misconduct, or misbehaviour by an employee which
Madras High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

M. Karnan vs The Presiding Officer on 9 June, 2008

term misconduct has been defined as under: The term misconduct implies a wrongful intention, and not a mere error of judgment.  Misconduct is not necessarily ... discipline amongst the employees would constitute misconduct; rowdy conduct in the course of working hours would constitute misconduct; misbehaviour committed even outside working hours
Madras High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 1 - K Chandru - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next