plaintiffs themselves could sue together. The Court pointed out further, that it was not open to the plaintiffs to sue together that there was misjoinder ... gave opportunity to the plaintiffs to elect and on the election three of the plaintiffs were struck off. The three plaintiffs went
Chancery practice there was this difficulty that the misjoinder of plaintiffs was fatal and that if you had any one person among the plaintiffs ... rendered unnecessary by the fact that the Courts may deal with misjoinder of plaintiffs according to the justice and equity of the case
Chancery practice there was this difficulty that the misjoinder of plaintiffs was fatal and that if you had any one person among the plaintiffs ... rendered unnecessary by the fact that the Courts may deal with misjoinder of plaintiffs, according to the justice and equity of the case
Code, it is clear that an objection of misjoinder of plaintiffs or misjoinder of causes of action, is a procedural objection ... court to proceed with the suit notwithstanding the defect of misjoinder of parties or misjoinder of causes of action and if the suit results
gravel by the plaintiffs against the claim of Rs.40,00,000/- by the plaintiffs. On 3.10.2006, the second plaintiff sent a letter ... dismissed on the ground of misjoinder of cause of action, misjoinder of parties. Admittedly, the first plaintiff is not a party to an agreement
case where a plaint suffers from the defect of misjoinder of parties or misjoinder of causes of action either in terms of Order I Rule ... Code, it is clear that an objection of misjoinder of plaintiffs or misjoinder of causes of action, is a procedural objection
Chancery Practice there was this difficulty, that the misjoinder of plaintiffs was fatal and that if you had any one person among the plaintiff ... rendered unnecessary by the fact that the Courts may deal with misjoinder of plaintiffs according to the justice and equity of the case
plaintiffs, and the only defence there, would have been misjoinder of plaintiffs, and that is a defence which the Court was not likely to view
Judge in Chambers after a finding of misjoinder of defendants gave the plaintiff 10 days in which to decide if he would split ... already pointed out, until the Court decided that there was misjoinder the plaintiff might well find a legal difficulty in separating the defendants and bringing
absence of any plea in the written statement on the misjoinder of parties and misjoinder of cause of action, the trial court was not within ... appellate court has also held that even assuming that there is misjoinder of plaintiffs, the decree cannot be reversed or substantially varied in appeal
