accepted by the Apex Court observing that it would be a misplaced sympathy.
43. In D.M. Premkumari Vs. The Divisional Commissioner, Mysore Division ... fairness. We hasten to add, judiciary does not believe in misplaced sympathy."
44. Giving reasons for not extending the indulgence in favour
laxity or concession in favour of
any student or any misplaced sympathy would not only give
leverage to many unscrupulous colleges and institutes but would ... clearly took a view that misplaced sympathy should not be
shown by the Courts in total breach of the rules. In this case
also
behalf of the
petitioner. Judgment can never be settled on misplaced sympathy and the
judgment ought to be settled on considering the legal principles ... indigenous factors. The Supreme Court had also repeatedly held that
misplaced sympathy cannot derive the judgments, may be a factor of equity is
also
Courts
cannot expand the scheme of compassionate appointment either on
misplaced sympathy or by applying the principles of liberal interpretation.
Thus, the Courts are expected ... appointment on
compassionate ground either in a liberal manner or by misplaced sympathy
which is impermissible in law.
4. When granting or extending the benefit
also portrayed. However, Courts
are not expected to take decision on misplaced sympathy. When the rights
are dealt with equally, the infringement of rights ... judicial review under Article 226 and providing appointment on certain
misplaced sympathy, it will result in unconstitutionality and deprive the
rights of all other eligible
High Court can take a lenient view or show
misplaced sympathy for the purpose of grant of regularization or permanent
absorption, which is otherwise ... mandates are preserved in the interest of the society at large. Misplaced
sympathy or leniency, if leads to unconstitutionality, then the Courts would
not show
under Article 142 of the
Constitution could not be exercised on misplaced sympathy. This Court
quoted with approval the observations of Farewell
under Article 142 of the
Constitution could not be exercised on misplaced sympathy. This Court
quoted with approval the observations of Farewell
opinion, will
have no role to play. Sympathy, as is well-known, should not be misplaced.
In Maruti Udyog Ltd. v. Ram Lal & Others ... jurisdiction under Article 142 of the
Constitution of India on misplaced sympathy.
69. In Teri Oat Estates (P) Ltd. v. U.T., Chandigarh
circumstances of the present case. In our considered
opinion, there is misplaced sympathy shown in the case of
the respondents who have worked with
