could have been charged-sheeted only under Section 8 of the
Act and not under Section 55(a) of the Act, which would apply only ... case, is Section 8(1) of the Abkari Act, as amended by Act 10 of 1996, not
Section 55(a). But, misquoting of the Section
Section 7 of the Act, he will be liable
under Section 25(1A) of the Act and it is a non-
bailable offence. Section ... initial stage and charge-sheet
has not been laid. Any misquoting of section will not
give any benefit to petitioners. Considering the
serious nature
Section 7
of the Act, he will be liable under Section 25(1A) of the Act and it
is a non-bailable offence. Section ... initial stage and charge-sheet has not been
laid. Any misquoting of section will not give any benefit to
petitioners. Considering the serious nature
sent a notice to him mentioning that there is
violation of Section 211 and 217 of the Companies Act. The period
mentioned in the notice ... concerned.
I like to make clear that there is misquoting of Section 277(2)
by the learned Magistrate himself. It ought to be Section
make correction in the order dated
21/01/2016 regarding misquote of Section. It is claimed that due to
typographical error Section
case, is Section 8(1) of the Abkari Act, as
amended by Act 10 of 1996, not Section 55(a). But
misquoting of the Section ... proper section which is attracted is
Section 8(2) of the Abkari Act as amended by Act 16 of
1997. However, misquoting of the section
also in causing the delay.
The learned counsel further submits that misquoting or wrong
quoting of a provision of law does not disentitle a litigant ... cause title. Substantial justice
cannot be denied on the basis of misquoting of section or rule.
No doubt, the Registry could have brought the same
also in causing the delay.
The learned counsel further submits that misquoting or wrong
quoting of a provision of law does not disentitle a litigant ... cause title. Substantial justice
cannot be denied on the basis of misquoting of section or rule.
No doubt, the Registry could have brought the same
also in causing the delay.
The learned counsel further submits that misquoting or wrong
quoting of a provision of law does not disentitle a litigant ... cause title. Substantial justice
cannot be denied on the basis of misquoting of section or rule.
No doubt, the Registry could have brought the same
point raised in the petition under Section
151 C.P.C., and has mechanically rejected the prayer
under Section 151 C.P.C.
Per contra ... advocate for the petitioner
submits that nomenclature of the petitioner or
misquoting of section would hardly matter, and
proposes for decision of the petition
