Global Poly Bags Industries (P)Ltd vs The Appellate Assistant ... on 5 January, 2011
been rightly contended by the appellant the assessing authority
has misquoted Section 12(3) in the matter of levy of penalty as against section
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 789 (0.86 seconds)Pavayammal vs Saraswathi
reasonable?
b. Whether the first appellate Court is right in misquoting
Section 92 of the Evidence Act, 1872 to non-suit the appellant
especially when
N.Satheswaran vs Kavitha Gananshamdas Reported In on 9 January, 2023
below commitÂ
ted an error in non-suiting the plaintiff by misquoting Section 16 (c ) of the
specific Relief Act?
Iii. Whether the suit
Shino Raj R vs State Of Kerala on 4 October, 2018
Rules of High Court of Kerala, 1971 is misquoted as
"Section 150" instead of "Rule 150". Similarly, on
the docket ... petition the provision of the said Rules is
misquoted as "Section 150" instead of "Rule 155".
It is trite law that
Shaji Jacob vs Shaji P.V
preferred after the
amendment of Cr.P.C . and proviso to Section 372 permits
the victim to prefer an appeal against the order of acquittal ... sessions court, this revision is maintainable like an appeal
and misquoting Section 397 instead of 372 proviso is a
clerical mistake and there
(Ad 38) vs Union Of India & Ors on 17 May, 2024
Learned counsel for the respondent authorities
argues that the investigation report misquoted the
Section under which the investigation was ordered. It is
pointed out that ... under Section
212(1) , sub-Section (c) and not sub-Section (a) of the
Companies Act .
Since the said order itself has been misquoted
Appellants/Accused vs State Of Kerala on 18 August, 2011
that in a case of
release under Section 3 of Probation of Offenders Act, the court is
empowered u/s 5 of the Probation ... illegal and only the
section is misquoted. Misquoting the section would not affect the core of
the order. Other than that, I find no error
N.Satheswaran vs Kavitha Gananshamdas Reported In on 9 January, 2023
below commit-
ted an error in non-suiting the plaintiff by misquoting Section 16 (c ) of the
specific Relief Act?
Iii. Whether the suit
(Kewala Devi Shaw & Ors vs Kali Prosad Shaw & Ors.) on 14 March, 2017
Title Suit no. 11 of 2015, by which the
application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure was rejected
declining to restore ... Order 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure instead
of misquoting Section 151 of the Code for restoration of the suit, the relief should
have
Anil vs State on 21 December, 2011
months. In the preface of the impugned
judgment, section of offence is misquoted as 55(i). Assailing the
above conviction and sentence, this appeal ... aware
that the allegations are there to face the trial, though section is
misquoted. He didn't raise the issue. Accordingly charge was
framed