that the tenancy commenced on 9th April, 1980 and thus by misreading the pleadings in the plaint the learned court below has committed a manifest ... rent. He, however, rejected the testimony of plaintiffs witnesses by misreading pleadings in the plaint which is apparent from the observations in the judgment already
though the pleadings as required under Section
13(3)(a)(i)(b) and (c) were not specifically pleaded, but there were
substantially pleaded ... petitioner,
therefore, was that this finding is outcome of misreading of pleadings
of the respondent / landlord.
C.R. No. 2648 of 2007
-17-
******
The learned
appellate court about tenancy of Jaswant Mal, is result of misreading of the pleadings and evidence available on record particularly ... first appellate court recorded finding by misconstruing the documentary evidence and misreading of pleadings and reading the evidence totally out of context. Secondly, I find
judgment and decree of
the Trial Court is perverse, in misreading the
pleadings and thereby decreeing the suit of the
plaintiff, when the plaintiff ... judgment
: 29 :
and decree of the Trial Court is perverse in misreading the
pleadings and thereby decreeing the suit of the plaintiff
based on title
plot No. 2338). Courts below have misread and misinterpreted the pleading of the parties and the documentary evidence available on record while coming to conclusion ... allotment of new plot no. 1759 is perverse and the result of misreading and misinterpretation of the evidence on record. Prima facie, it appears that
Trial Court are a result of complete
rt
misreading of pleadings, evidence and the law as
applicable to the facts of the case and particularly
court and the learned trial court are a result of
complete misreading of pleadings, evidence and the
law as applicable to the facts ... really do not find there being any misreading of pleadings,
evidence more particularly, when the facts in question are
not in dispute and pure question
Appellate Court are found to be based on perverse appreciation and
misreading of pleadings and evidence, so much so that, if allowed to
stand, would ... Appellate Court is the most probable
view. No perversity or misreading of pleadings / evidence is found.
Therefore no interference is called for.
24. The Revision
Appellate Court are found to be based on perverse appreciation and
misreading of pleadings and evidence, so much so that, if allowed to
stand, would ... Appellate Court is the most probable
view. No perversity or misreading of pleadings / evidence is found.
Therefore no interference is called for.
24. The Revision
Appellate Court are found to be based on perverse appreciation and
misreading of pleadings and evidence, so much so that, if allowed to
stand, would ... Appellate Court is the most probable
view. No perversity or misreading of pleadings / evidence is found.
Therefore no interference is called for.
24. The Revision
