case is based on a positive assertion of a fraudulent misrepresentation to which the Exception attached to S. 19 of the Act, has no application ... Contract Act. Section 17 defines "fraud" while Section 18 defines "misrepresentation". So far as this case is concerned. the plaintiff
alternate setting aside of the sale deed on the ground of
misrepresentation defined under section 18 of the Contract
Act, which renders the sale voidable ... made upon
the misrepresentation of facts, which renders the sale
voidable at the option of parties as defined under the Indian
Contract Act . However, without
based on free consent. The word 'consent' is defined under Section 13 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (for short ... Section 15 , or undue influence, as defined in Section 16 , or fraud, as defined under Section 17 , or misrepresentation, as defined in Section
order in
absence of any statutory provision on account of fraud or
misrepresentation, he would invite the attention of the
court to the contents ... Indian Contract Act, 1872 where fraud and
misrepresentation are defined, Mr. Shah, learned Senior
Counsel would submit that an element of fraud would
require intentional
order in
absence of any statutory provision on account of fraud or
misrepresentation, he would invite the attention of the
court to the contents ... Indian Contract Act, 1872 where fraud and
misrepresentation are defined, Mr. Shah, learned Senior
Counsel would submit that an element of fraud would
require intentional
settled that misrepresentation itself
amounts to fraud. Indeed, innocent misrepresentation may also give
reason to claim relief against fraud. A fraudulent misrepresentation is
called deceit ... therefore a misrepresentation, if it was at the material date
false in substance and in fact. Section 17 of the Contract Act
defines fraud
Manjulaben Punaji Gameti (Principal) vs State Of Gujarat on 5 April, 2024
Author: Biren Vaishnav
emphasis supplied)
The section does not define the expression" "abet", nor is the
expression defined in Chapter II of the Code which ... abetment". Section 107 in this Chapter
defines "abetment of a thing", while Section 108 defines the
expression "abettor". This
emphasis supplied)
The section does not define the expression" "abet", nor is the
expression defined in Chapter II of the Code which ... abetment". Section 107 in this Chapter
defines "abetment of a thing", while Section 108 defines the
expression "abettor". This
emphasis supplied)
The section does not define the expression" "abet", nor is the expression
defined in Chapter II of the Code which ... abetment". Section 107 in this Chapter defines
"abetment of a thing", while Section 108 defines the expression
"abettor". This
