documents, he had come to know that the defendants 1 & 2 had committed fraud upon him in obtaining the documents by misrepresentation. In addition ... documents in question and on the other hand, the plaintiffs having admitted the execution of the documents and they having pleaded only misrepresentation and fraud
contents of the documents or that she did not
sign the said documents or otherwise she signed them out of
misrepresentation. She did not file ... documents had
been obtained by misrepresentation, then the documents become voidable
documents. Misrepresentation had been defined in Section 18 of the Indian
Contract
that the fraudulent
misrepresentation as regards character of a document is void but
fraudulent misrepresentation as regards contents of a document is
voidable stating ... distinction between fraudulent
misrepresentation as to the character of the
document and fraudulent misrepresentation
as to the contents thereof. With reference to
the former
misrepresentation as regards
its contents.
14
22. In Ningawwa v. Byrappa this Court held
that the fraudulent misrepresentation as regards
character of a document ... distinction between
fraudulent misrepresentation as to the
character of the document and fraudulent
misrepresentation as to the contents
thereof. With reference to the former
misrepresentation as to the character of the document and
fraudulent misrepresentation as to the contents thereof. It
was held that the defence was available only ... distinction between fraudulent misrepresentation as to
the character of the document and fraudulent
misrepresentation as to the contents thereof. With reference
to the former
Council true
and complete information and documents required for various
purposes. If the information given and/or the documents pro-
vided to the Council ... notifying dates in such cases where specific
complaints of falsification of documents, misrepresentation, vio-
lation of norms of standards, malpractices, etc., are received
character of the document and the contents of the document was considered
unsatisfactory inasmuch as the 'character' of the document may itself depend ... appears from the documents, and of the sale and lease documents
having been got executed and registered from him by misrepresentation. Per
Section
documents, as alleged, or did not say anything about the document itself, then the allegation of fraud and fraudulent misrepresentation by defendants ... distinction between fraudulent misrepresentation as to the character of the document and fraudulent misrepresentation as to the contents thereof. With reference to the former
distinction between fraudulent misrepresentation as to the character of the document, and fraudulent misrepresentation as to the contents thereof. With reference to former ... distinction between fraudulent misrepresentation as to the character of the document and fraudulent misrepresentation as not the contents thereof. It was held that the defence
When the plaintiff makes out a case of fraud and misrepresentation then the document in question itself is void and assuming that defendant ... distinction between fraudulent representation as to character of a document and fraudulent misrepresentation as to the contents of document. The Supreme Court observed thus
