Sc No. 28276/2016 State vs . Sandeep Kumar Page No. 1Of 5 on 29 August, 2017
police station Hari Nagar in respect of the victim missing from the hospital. The
relevant documents have also been placed on record by the Investigating
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 156 (2.00 seconds)Firoz vs State (Gnct Of Delhi) on 25 May, 2016
willingly accompanied the
appellant to perform marriage with him at Aligarh. Necessary documents
were executed in support of performance of marriage at Aligarh. Counsel
would ... aged around 20 years and it was
so reflected in the document (Ex.PW-1/B). The date of birth recorded in the
school record
State vs Vikas Yadav on 11 April, 2018
mention here that during the trial, the
accused has admitted two documents u/s 294 Cr.P.C i.e. recording ... submitted that he has no objection if the
said documents are admitted in evidence without calling the concerned
witnesses to prove the same. Accordingly
State vs . Sajid on 30 September, 2013
file a complaint about missing of his daughter i.e. the
prosecutrix, who had been missing 1/ 2 days prior to the said complaint ... have any document
of date of birth of the prosecutrix and that he did not have document of birth of any of his
children
Irfan vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 9 September, 2021
wherebaout
and not been able to find about her whereabouts, the missing person
report Exhibit P/14 was filed and the report is Exhibit ... stated that after coming to know that his
daughter was missing, he accompanied his mother Kamla Bai to
police station where her mother lodged
State vs . Vijay Kumar on 7 September, 2016
Sagar Pur that his daughter prosecutrix X aged about
14 years is missing since 09.08.2015 and somebody kidnapped
her. On these facts ... taken. Accused was
provided with the copies of the charge sheet and documents. After
hearing the arguments on charge, charge under Section 4 POCSO
Pankaj Saini vs State And Anr. on 4 November, 2022
relied on. It is only in absence of any
of document as envisaged U/s 94 (2) (i) or (ii), Section 94 (2) (iii)
postulates ... present case, father of Victim lodged her missing complaint
on 04.02.2019 informing that the Victim "A" aged 17 years 06 moths is
missing
Shakil vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 29 March, 2022
regarding rape has
been given in the medical report. Before registration of missing
person report as well as F.I.R., the prossecutrix was already ... disclosed by the father of the prosecutrix from his
diary and no documents issued by Hospital, Municipal
Corporation or Panchayat was produced. Dr. Vishnulata Uikey
Mohammed Sherif vs State By on 10 June, 2009
prosecution, twelve witnesses were examined and as many as twenty documents and 10 material objects were marked. Neither oral nor documentary evidence ... victim girls, PW2 Kavitha and PW3 Manjula. PW1 speaks to the missing of both his daughters and the first information report, Ex.P1 lodged
Rajkumar vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 22 February, 2012
when she returned
home after taking bath, she found the prosecutrix missing,
extensive search was made and near bus stand she was
informed ... present there that the accused
persons had taken the prosecutrix and thereafter missing
report was lodged. In respect of the age of the prosecutrix
this