Petitioner was absent, therefore, there was no question of
admission of any documents, including the claim. There is nothing
on record to show that ... defined and quite limited. The filing of supporting
material and/or missing document and/or supporting affidavit, even if
is practice and accepted mode
Admittedly, the original agreements signed by both the parties
were missing. The documents on record shows only one signature.
But there is no denial ... relevant aspect of proofs of actual compensation and the
mitigation are missing. The principles of Code of Civil Procedure (for
short
dispute nor the existence of the documents
signed by the Petitioner, the Petitioner just cannot rely on one
document to show and submit the case ... other documents support the
same to show that both the parties have acted upon legally by signing
various corresponding and relevant documents. The missing signature
Petitioners. Same is
missing here. Respondent's decision not to lead evidence specifically
when they require to prove their own documents which is mandate
Petitioners. Same is
missing here. Respondent's decision not to lead evidence specifically
when they require to prove their own documents which is mandate
Petitioners. Same is
missing here. Respondent's decision not to lead evidence specifically
when they require to prove their own documents which is mandate
Petitioners. Same is
missing here. Respondent's decision not to lead evidence specifically
when they require to prove their own documents which is mandate
Petitioners. Same is
missing here. Respondent's decision not to lead evidence specifically
when they require to prove their own documents which is mandate
Petitioners. Same is
missing here. Respondent's decision not to lead evidence specifically
when they require to prove their own documents which is mandate
Petitioners. Same is
missing here. Respondent's decision not to lead evidence specifically
when they require to prove their own documents which is mandate
