rule is to assist the family of a
deceased/missing Government employee of Group C and D
category, in tiding over the emergent situation, resulting ... such assistance is to be given even in case of a missing
employee. The financial assistance as envisaged under the
Rules of 2006 has absolutely
November 6, 2007, and did not categorise legal heirs of a missing
employee to be benefited under the said scheme. He would further
submit that ... scheme came into effect at a time when the said missing
employee, was discharging duties in a regular manner. Therefore, it is
suggested that acceptance
that the bank was under legal obligation not to
treat the missing employee as dead even before the period of 7 years
as provided under ... date of presumption of death of the missing
employee which can be drawn under Section 108 of the Evidence Act,
the petitioner was not even
alleged
that on 12.8.1988, he tried to molest a woman employee of
the Council, Miss X (name withheld by us) who was at the
relevant ... fact that the conduct of the respondent
against his junior female employee, Miss X, was wholly
against moral sanctions, decency and was offensive
Suit for
declaration of continuance in service by an illegally dis-
missed employee after three years--Barred by limitation.
Civil Service--Dismissal--Illegal--Suit
family of a deceased Government employee
who dies while in service/missing Government employee, namely:-
(emphasis supplied)
Rule 2 stipulates the objects of the Rules ... namely, to assist the family of
a deceased/missing Government employee of Group C and D category, in tiding
over the emergent situation, resulting from
Similarly, in Utkal Machinery, Ltd. v. Miss Santi Patnaik 1966-I L.L. J. 398 the employee, held to have boon wrongfully dismissed ... from those in the present case. In that case the aggrieved employee, Miss Scott, was in the employment of the Assam Oil Company
Management Utkal Machinery Ltd vs Workmen, Miss Shanti Patnaik on 27 October, 1965
Equivalent citations: 1966 SCR (2) 434, 1966 AIR 1051, AIR 1966 SUPREME ... from those in the present case. In that case the
aggrieved employee, Miss Scott was in the employment of the
Assam
possible that by
reason of such a cut-off date an employee misses his
chance very narrowly. Such hazards would be there
case of alleged act of disobedience on the part of an employee Miss Jean Maude who had been employed as an advertisement representative ... further held that the act of disobedience on the part of Miss Jean in leaving the conference room did not amount to such a wilful
