opponent that the amount deposited in this
Court is towards pension and now the Honourable Supreme Court has, in
the case between the General Manager ... that daily wage employees of Railway would not be entitled to
pension. Miss Mehta, appearing for opponent i.e. Original petitioner
submitted that in this
Missing Defence Personnel is not affected. All the
next of kin of the Missing Defence Personnel are provided with
benefits of Liberalized Family Pension, Monetary ... submits that the next of the kin of the missing
soldiers are given Family Pension in accordance with the existing
rules.
6. Therefore,
the only
under the Revised Pension Scheme, contained in the Resolution dated 1st January, 1972, the petitioner is not entitled to receive family pension."
That Government ... retired before 1st June, 1971 is not entitled to family pension.
3. Miss. Trivedi, learned Counsel for the petitioner, has relied on the case
scheme under Package-II
would have an option to switch over to pension scheme
and if no option is exercised by 31 st December ... switch over from CPF to Pension scheme, there
were large number of employees in PRL who had missed
out exercising such option. About 200 such
petitioners for the pension despite there being specific
option made available for the second time to the retired employees, who
had missed out the same
regularisation is
taken into consideration for the purpose of
computing pension or making pension available
to such retired employee."
Page 5 of 11
Downloaded ... pension orders
indicate that the services rendered by the
petitioners prior to their date of regularization
appears to have been missed in calculating the
pensionary
7769/2020 ORDER
purposes of pension.
4. Prima facie, perusal of the pension orders
indicate that the services rendered by the petitioners
prior to their ... such petitioners prior
to their regularization appears to have been missed while
computing the pension. The respondents shall take
decision in accordance with law keeping
pension orders indicate that
the services rendered by the petitioners prior to their date of
regularization appears to have been missed in calculating the
pensionary ... such petitioners prior to their regularization appears to have
been missed while computing the pension. The respondents
shall take decision in accordance with law keeping
paying terminal benefits
of her missing husband to the petitioner including PF,
Gratuity, Family pension, etc.
(B) Your Lordships may be pleased to direct ... departmental inquiry on absenteeism against a
missing person is unlawful in as much as the person
actually missing due to unknown reason cannot defend
only
then the concerned employee can be termed to have
missed his entitled for pension by couple of months. In this
matter, the point
